Measures and models of personality and their effects on communication and team performance

Abstract The importance of teams and their impact on the contemporary workplace cannot be overstated. Many studies have been conducted to point to specific relevant factors related to team performance. Nonetheless, there remains relatively little that is known about the mechanisms and interactions that lead to high performing teams. In this study we consider communication (a key feature of teamwork) as a potentially mediating factor between each aspect of human personality (as measured by the Five Factor Model) and team performance. This exploratory study sheds further light on how personalities affect teams via communication, using a structural equation modeling approach. Results indicate that at least one team measure of extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, and openness is moderated by communication in influencing team performance. Relevance to industry This research can aid managers on the relative importance of personality metrics on team performance, as well as the nature of the relationships among these metrics. This has the potential to improve organizational performance and reinforces the need for communication in fostering teamwork.

[1]  Alastair J. Gill,et al.  Perception of e-mail personality at zero-acquaintance: Extraversion takes care of itself; Neuroticism is a worry , 2003 .

[2]  F. Morgeson,et al.  SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[3]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[4]  P. A. Nelson,et al.  Caught in the Act: How Extraverted and Introverted Friends Communally Cope with Being Recorded. , 2009, Journal of research in personality.

[5]  Ulf Kroehne,et al.  (Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling , 2003 .

[6]  Gretchen A. Macht,et al.  Structural models of extraversion, communication, and team performance , 2014 .

[7]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED , 1998 .

[8]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions , 1998 .

[9]  P. MacIntyre,et al.  Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication , 1996 .

[10]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[12]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[13]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[14]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[15]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The predictive validity of the EPI and 16PF for military flying training , 1995 .

[16]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[17]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Eysenck's BIG THREE and communication traits: three correlational studies , 2001 .

[18]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  T. J. Allen.  Studies of the Problem-Solving Process in Engineering , 1966 .

[20]  A. Furnham,et al.  Personality and preference for academic assessment: A study with Australian University students , 2005 .

[21]  Hokyoung Ryu,et al.  Risky business or sharing the load? - Social flow in collaborative mobile learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[22]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[23]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[24]  Ronald J. Deluga.  Leader-Member Exchange Quality and Effectiveness Ratings , 1998 .

[25]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance , 2001 .

[26]  A. Furnham.  Personality and Intelligence at Work: Exploring and Explaining Individual Differences at Work , 2008 .

[27]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  When opposites attract: a multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[28]  Michael J. Beatty,et al.  Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A Communibiological paradigm , 1998 .

[29]  Lishi Kwasitsu,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of design, process, and manufacturing engineers , 2003 .

[30]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  E. Salas,et al.  Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. , 1993 .

[32]  A. Thorne.  The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. , 1987 .

[33]  S. K. Horwitz.  The Compositional Impact of Team Diversity on Performance: Theoretical Considerations , 2005 .

[34]  R. Goffin,et al.  The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? , 2006 .

[35]  Leaetta M. Hough,et al.  I/Owes its advances to personality. , 2001 .

[36]  Alastair J. Gill,et al.  Taking Care of the Linguistic Features of Extraversion , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[37]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Explaining Knowledge Sharing , 2006, Commun. Res..

[38]  Linda C. Angell,et al.  Personality Heterogeneity in Teams , 2003 .

[39]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[40]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Correlates of Compulsive Communication: Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics. , 1995 .

[42]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .