Noninvasive assessment of bone density and structure using computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

For several reasons, including low cost and radiation dose, simplicity, and the ability to image several skeletal sites, dual X-ray absoptiometry (DXA) is the most widely employed technique for diagnostic and serial assessment of integral bone mass in osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. However, three-dimensional imaging modalities such as quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offer the ability to separately examine different factors that may play independent and important roles in osteoporosis. These factors include the density of the trabecular and cortical compartments as well as the pattern of trabecular microarchitecture. New developments in QCT include volumetric approaches for precise compartmental assessment of the spine and proximal femur as well as thin-slice tomography of the vertebral body for assessment of trabecular texture. In addition, ultrahigh resolution CT scanners (spatial resolution ë50-150(i)i) have been developed for imaging of trabecular structure in specimens and in some cases for the peripheral skeleton (distal radius and phalanges). High resolution MR measurements may be employed for assessment of the trabecular texture at a range of peripheral sites, including the calcaneus, distal radius, and phalanges.

[1]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  Bruce H. Hasegawa,et al.  CT-derived finite element models to determine vertebral cortex strength , 1990, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[3]  C Kimme-Smith,et al.  Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast. , 1987, Radiology.

[4]  T. Husby,et al.  Bone-mass distribution in the femur. A cadaver study on the relations of structure and strength. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[5]  L. Avioli,et al.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. , 1990, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[6]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  W A Kalender,et al.  Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT. , 1987, Radiology.

[8]  W. Kalender,et al.  Global and regional variations in the spinal trabecular bone: single and dual energy examinations. , 1991, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[9]  W C Hayes,et al.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Three-dimensional quantitative CT of the proximal femur: relationship to vertebral trabecular bone density in postmenopausal women. , 1988, Radiology.

[11]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Computed tomographic measurement of cortical bone geometry. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. Adams Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) , 1989 .

[14]  G. Guglielmi,et al.  Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[15]  D. Cody,et al.  Correlations Between Vertebral Regional Bone Mineral Density (rBMD) and Whole Bone Fracture Load , 1991, Spine.

[16]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  K Engelke,et al.  Significance of QCT Bone Mineral Density and Its Standard Deviation as Parameters to Evaluate Osteoporosis , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Evaluation of technical factors affecting the quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Bone.

[19]  K Engelke,et al.  A digital model of trabecular bone , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  H. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography of Vertebral Spongiosa: A Sensitive Method for Detecting Early Bone Loss After Oophorectomy , 1982, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Trabecular bone density in the proximal femur: quantitative CT assessment. Work in progress. , 1986, Radiology.

[22]  H. Genant,et al.  Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography. , 1980, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  H. Genant,et al.  Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular structure , 1997, European Radiology.

[25]  Stephen J. Riederer,et al.  Medical imaging [6] , 1995 .

[26]  F. Wehrli,et al.  High‐resolution variable flip angle 3D MR imaging of trabecular microstructure in vivo , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  W. Hayes,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single‐energy quantitative computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.