Acceptability of the German Charging Scheme for Heavy Goods Vehicles: Empirical Evidence from a Freight Company Survey

Abstract While several European and national studies have dealt with the acceptability of road pricing schemes for passenger transport, only sparse research is available on this issue for freight transport. Against this background, the paper deals with the acceptability of the German road user‐charging scheme for heavy goods vehicles by the road haulage industry. It presents the findings of an internet‐based survey with German road freight operators from which responses on a variety of attitude questions and on a stated‐preference exercise regarding the use of revenues were collected. The study shows that the German transport industry recognizes the severity of transport‐related problems such as neglected road maintenance and congestion. The general idea of distance‐related road user charging is accepted but the scheme is not considered to be effective in reducing traffic on motorways or increasing efficiency of transports. Using the charging revenues within the road sector, e.g. without any form of cross‐subsidising other modes of transport, is decisive for making the charging scheme acceptable for German road hauliers. This is reinforced by the responses on the stated preference exercise where a trade‐off between charge level and use of revenues has been revealed. German hauliers would even accept higher charges than currently raised if revenues were used for road maintenance and relief of bottlenecks.

[1]  Bernhard Schlag,et al.  PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING , 1997 .

[2]  Brendan Bartley,et al.  Mobility impacts, reactions and opinions : traffic demand management options in Europe : the MIRO Project , 1995 .

[3]  Elizabeth Deakin,et al.  TRANSPORTATION PRICING STRATEGIES FOR CALIFORNIA: AN ASSESSMENT OF CONGESTION, EMISSIONS, ENERGY, AND EQUITY IMPACTS. FINAL REPORT , 1996 .

[4]  Peter Jones,et al.  Road Pricing: The Public Viewpoint , 1995 .

[5]  P. Jones,et al.  UK Public Attitudes to Urban Traffic Problems and Possible Countermeasures: A Poll of Polls , 1991 .

[6]  Peter Else,et al.  No entry for congestion taxes , 1986 .

[7]  Peter Jones,et al.  Urban road pricing: public acceptability and barriers to implementation , 1998 .

[8]  C.A.J. Vlek,et al.  The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures , 1997 .

[9]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[10]  S. Ison.  Local authority and academic attitudes to urban road pricing: a UK perspective , 2000 .

[11]  K. Small.  Using the revenues from congestion pricing , 1992 .

[12]  P. Goodwin.  THE "RULE OF THREE": A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE POLITICAL PROBLEM OF COMPETING OBJECTIVES FOR ROAD PRICING. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 2003 .

[13]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[14]  Neil Thorpe,et al.  PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO TDM MEASURES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2000 .

[15]  Andreas Homburg,et al.  Umweltpsychologie : Umweltkrise, Gesellschaft und Individuum , 1998 .

[16]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The social support for policy measures in passenger transport: a statistical analysis for the Netherlands , 1999 .

[17]  John W. Polak,et al.  Acceptability of Transport Pricing Measures Among Public and Professionals in Europe , 2003 .

[18]  John Maule,et al.  Road User Charging – Pricing Structures. , 2004 .

[19]  G. Giuliano.  EQUITY AND FAIRNESS CONSIDERATIONS OF CONGESTION PRICING , 1994 .

[20]  Y. Cohen,et al.  COMMUTER WELFARE UNDER PEAK-PERIOD CONGESTION TOLLS : WHO GAINS AND WHO LOSES? , 1987 .