Dispersion movements in ants: spatial structuring and density-dependent effects

This paper examines whether the characteristics of individual dispersion movements in ants are changed when workers are moving solitarily or in a group. We analyzed the trajectories of workers of the species Messor sancta moving solitarily or in groups of different size (5, 10, 15 individuals), tested for density-dependent effects on their trajectory characteristics and investigated through resampling techniques whether ants are able to spatially structure their movements through direct (e.g. contact) or indirect (pheromone deposited on the ground) interactions. In addition to group size, the effects of the nutritional state of the colony and of the state of the area on which ants were dispersing were also examined. Solitary ants moved faster and had more sinuous trajectories than ants moving in a group. We found however no significant differences in trajectory characteristics between groups of different size. Whatever the group size, ants from starved colonies moved more slowly and had more direct trajectories than their counterpart coming from fed colonies. On the other hand, the state of the area on which ants were moving had no direct significant effect on dispersion movement. Ants dispersing in a group moved independently and did not coordinate their movements through direct or indirect interactions. However, the geometry of their path was changed not only through the effect of random encounters with other workers but also through an active modification of their movement when they perceived directly or indirectly the presence of nearby workers.

[1]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[2]  J. Fewell Energetic and time costs of foraging in harvester ants, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  S. Levin Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[4]  明 大久保,et al.  Diffusion and ecological problems : mathematical models , 1980 .

[5]  P. Turchin,et al.  Beyond simple diffusion: models of not-so-simple movement of animals and cells , 1989 .

[6]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  E. E. Holmes,et al.  Are Diffusion Models too Simple? A Comparison with Telegraph Models of Invasion , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[8]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[9]  M K Tourtellot,et al.  The problem of movelength and turn definition in analysis of orientation data. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  John A. Wiens,et al.  On quantifying insect movements , 1993 .

[11]  Derek Cosens,et al.  An experimental study of the foraging strategy of the wood ant Formica aquilonia , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The expandable network of ant exploration , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Daniel W. Leger,et al.  An assessment of data pooling and some alternatives , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  F R Adler,et al.  Information Collection and Spread by Networks of Patrolling Ants , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Energetics of group foraging: Analysis of a random-walk model , 1995 .

[16]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[17]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  G. Ruxton Foraging in flocks: non-spatial models may neglect important costs , 1995 .

[19]  Kimberly A. With Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  J. Leblanc THÈSE DE 3ÈME CYCLE , 1978 .

[21]  W. H. Neill,et al.  Modelling animal movement as a persistent random walk in two dimensions: expected magnitude of net displacement , 2000 .

[22]  A. Ōkubo Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds. , 1986, Advances in biophysics.

[23]  P. Turchin Animal Groups in Three Dimensions: Quantitative analysis of animal movements in congregations , 1997 .

[24]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Group and mass recruitment in ant colonies: the influence of contact rates , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  D. Gordon,et al.  What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Group-Level Exploration Tactics in Fire Ants , 1988 .

[27]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Quantifying insect movement in the field , 1991 .

[28]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Risk-sensitive foraging: A review of the theory , 1992 .