The behavior of the modified FX-LMS algorithm with secondary path modeling errors
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S.C. Douglas. An efficient implementation of the modified filtered-X LMS algorithm , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.
[2] Dennis R. Morgan,et al. An analysis of multiple correlation cancellation loops with a filter in the auxiliary path , 1980, ICASSP.
[3] S.J. Elliott,et al. Active noise control , 1993, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.
[4] Paulo Alexandre Crisóstomo Lopes,et al. A Kalman filter approach to active noise control , 2000, 2000 10th European Signal Processing Conference.
[5] Scott D. Snyder,et al. The effect of transfer function estimation errors on the filtered-x LMS algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..
[6] P. K. Chaturvedi,et al. Communication Systems , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.
[7] Scott D. Snyder,et al. The influence of transducer transfer functions and acoustic time delays on the implementation of the LMS algorithm in active noise control systems , 1990 .
[8] S. Haykin,et al. Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .
[9] M. Rupp,et al. Modified FxLMS algorithms with improved convergence performance , 1995, Conference Record of The Twenty-Ninth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.
[10] Martin Bouchard,et al. Multichannel recursive-least-square algorithms and fast-transversal-filter algorithms for active noise control and sound reproduction systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[11] Paulo Alexandre Crisóstomo Lopes,et al. Effects of secondary path modeling errors on the Modified FX-LMS algorithm for active noise control , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).
[12] Elias Bjarnason. Analysis of the filtered-X LMS algorithm , 1995, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..