Three operational, engineering model, 7-kW ion thrusters and one instrumented, dormant thruster were installed in a cluster array in a large vacuum facility at NASA Glenn Research Center. A series of engineering demonstration tests were performed to evaluate the system performance impacts of operating various multiple-thruster configurations in an array. A suite of diagnostics was installed to investigate multiple-thruster operation impact on thruster performance and life, thermal interactions, and alternative system modes and architectures. The ion beam characterization included measuring ion current density profiles and ion energy distribution with Faraday probes and retarding potential analyzers, respectively. This report focuses on the ion beam characterization during single thruster operation, multiple thruster operation, various neutralizer configurations, and thruster gimbal articulation. Comparison of beam profiles collected during single and multiple thruster operation demonstrated the utility of superimposing single engine beam profiles to predict multi-thruster beam profiles. High energy ions were detected in the region 45 off the thruster axis, independent of thruster power, number of operating thrusters, and facility background pressure, which indicated that the most probable ion energy was not effected by multiple-thruster operation. There were no significant changes to the beam profiles collected during alternate thruster-neutralizer configurations, therefore supporting the viability of alternative system configuration options. Articulation of one thruster shifted its beam profile, whereas the beam profile of a stationary thruster nearby did not change, indicating there were no beam interactions which was consistent with the behavior of a collisionless beam expansion.
[1]
Fred Wilson,et al.
Development of a Ground Based Digital Control Interface Unit (DCIU) for the NEXT Propulsion System
,
2004
.
[2]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
Plasma Characteristics Measured in the Plume of a Next Multi-Thruster Array
,
2013
.
[3]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
Status of the NEXT Ion Engine Wear Test
,
2003
.
[4]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Phase 2 Development Status
,
2005
.
[5]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
NEXT Ion Engine 2000 hour Wear Test Plume and Erosion Results
,
2004
.
[6]
Fred Wilson,et al.
Overview of the NEXT Ion Propulsion System Program at Aerojet
,
2005
.
[7]
Luis R. Pinero,et al.
Status Of The NEXT 7 KW Power Processing Unit
,
2005
.
[8]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
NEXT Ion Engine 2000 Hour Wear Test Results
,
2004
.
[9]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
NEXT Multi-Thruster Array Test - Engineering Demonstration
,
2006
.
[10]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
Characterization of Plasma Flux Incident on a Multi - Thruster Array
,
2006
.
[11]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
Neutralizer Plasma Coupling in a NEXT Multi-Thruster Array
,
2006
.
[12]
Michael J. Patterson,et al.
NEXT: NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster
,
2002
.