Logic as Marr's Computational Level: Four Case Studies

We sketch four applications of Marr's levels-of-analysis methodology to the relations between logic and experimental data in the cognitive neuroscience of language and reasoning. The first part of the paper illustrates the explanatory power of computational level theories based on logic. We show that a Bayesian treatment of the suppression task in reasoning with conditionals is ruled out by EEG data, supporting instead an analysis based on defeasible logic. Further, we describe how results from an EEG study on temporal prepositions can be reanalyzed using formal semantics, addressing a potential confound. The second part of the article demonstrates the predictive power of logical theories drawing on EEG data on processing progressive constructions and on behavioral data on conditional reasoning in people with autism. Logical theories can constrain processing hypotheses all the way down to neurophysiology, and conversely neuroscience data can guide the selection of alternative computational level models of cognition.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Recognizing Sequences of Sequences , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  Testing a Simplified Method for Measuring Velocity Integration in Saccades Using a Manipulation of Target Contrast , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[3]  Roel M. Willems Re-Appreciating the Why of Cognition: 35 Years after Marr and Poggio , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[4]  Itamar Lerner,et al.  Spreading Activation in an Attractor Network With Latching Dynamics: Automatic Semantic Priming Revisited , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  R. Byrne Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals , 1989, Cognition.

[6]  Giosue Baggio,et al.  Two ERP studies on Dutch temporal semantics , 2004 .

[7]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The memory, unification, and control (MUC) model of language , 2007 .

[8]  P. Blackburn,et al.  Book Reviews: The Proper Treatment of Events, by Michiel van Lambalgen and Fritz Hamm , 2005, CL.

[9]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  The Processing Consequences of the Imperfective Paradox , 2007, J. Semant..

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Computing and recomputing discourse models : An ERP study , 2008 .

[12]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[13]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Reasoning with Exceptions: An Event-related Brain Potentials Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Potthast,et al.  Inverse problems in dynamic cognitive modeling. , 2009, Chaos.

[15]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[16]  Alessandro Treves,et al.  Free association transitions in models of cortical latching dynamics , 2008 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Defeasible reasoning in high-functioning adults with autism: Evidence for impaired exception-handling , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  J. Russell Autism as an executive disorder , 1997 .

[20]  Nick Chater,et al.  Probabilities and Pragmatics in Conditional Inference: Suppression and Order Effects , 2003 .

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Free-energy and the brain , 2007, Synthese.

[22]  T. Kidd,et al.  Cognitive theories of autism spectrum disorders: how do they impact children's ability to learn in education settings? ; Coming home: Exploring the experiences of mothers home educating their children with autism spectrum disorder , 2008 .