Machine learning of solvent effects on molecular spectra and reactions

Fast and accurate simulation of complex chemical systems in environments such as solutions is a long standing challenge in theoretical chemistry. In recent years, machine learning has extended the boundaries of quantum chemistry by providing highly accurate and efficient surrogate models of electronic structure theory, which previously have been out of reach for conventional approaches. Those models have long been restricted to closed molecular systems without accounting for environmental influences, such as external electric and magnetic fields or solvent effects. Here, we introduce the deep neural network FieldSchNet for modeling the interaction of molecules with arbitrary external fields. FieldSchNet offers access to a wealth of molecular response properties, enabling it to simulate a wide range of molecular spectra, such as infrared, Raman and nuclear magnetic resonance. Beyond that, it is able to describe implicit and explicit molecular environments, operating as a polarizable continuum model for solvation or in a quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics setup. We employ FieldSchNet to study the influence of solvent effects on molecular spectra and a Claisen rearrangement reaction. Based on these results, we use FieldSchNet to design an external environment capable of lowering the activation barrier of the rearrangement reaction significantly, demonstrating promising venues for inverse chemical design.

[1]  O. A. von Lilienfeld,et al.  Retrospective on a decade of machine learning for chemical discovery , 2020, Nature Communications.

[2]  Alexandre Tkatchenko,et al.  Machine learning for chemical discovery , 2020, Nature Communications.

[3]  K. Müller,et al.  Dynamical strengthening of covalent and non-covalent molecular interactions by nuclear quantum effects at finite temperature , 2020, Nature communications.

[4]  Yaolong Zhang,et al.  Towards Efficient and Accurate Spectroscopic Simulations in Extended Systems with Symmetry-Preserving Neural Network Models for Tensorial Properties , 2020 .

[5]  R. Car,et al.  Raman spectrum and polarizability of liquid water from deep neural networks. , 2020, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[6]  Julia Westermayr,et al.  Combining SchNet and SHARC: The SchNarc Machine Learning Approach for Excited-State Dynamics , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[7]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[8]  K. Müller,et al.  Exploring chemical compound space with quantum-based machine learning , 2019, Nature Reviews Chemistry.

[9]  F. Noé,et al.  Deep-neural-network solution of the electronic Schrödinger equation , 2019, Nature Chemistry.

[10]  Kristof T. Schütt,et al.  Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[11]  Andrea Grisafi,et al.  Using Gaussian process regression to simulate the vibrational Raman spectra of molecular crystals , 2019, New Journal of Physics.

[12]  Risi Kondor,et al.  Cormorant: Covariant Molecular Neural Networks , 2019, NeurIPS.

[13]  Michael Gastegger,et al.  Symmetry-adapted generation of 3d point sets for the targeted discovery of molecules , 2019, NeurIPS.

[14]  K. Müller,et al.  Quantum chemical accuracy from density functional approximations via machine learning , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  Markus Meuwly,et al.  PhysNet: A Neural Network for Predicting Energies, Forces, Dipole Moments, and Partial Charges. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[16]  S. H. Mushrif,et al.  Origins of complex solvent effects on chemical reactivity and computational tools to investigate them: a review , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.

[17]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Learning representations of molecules and materials with atomistic neural networks , 2018, Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics.

[18]  David A. Strubbe,et al.  Deep learning and density-functional theory , 2018, Physical Review A.

[19]  Yang Yang,et al.  Accurate molecular polarizabilities with coupled cluster theory and machine learning , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  K-R Müller,et al.  SchNetPack: A Deep Learning Toolbox For Atomistic Systems. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[21]  Geoffrey J. Gordon,et al.  A Density Functional Tight Binding Layer for Deep Learning of Chemical Hamiltonians. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering , 2018, Science.

[23]  Anders S. Christensen,et al.  Operators in quantum machine learning: Response properties in chemical space. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  M. Ceriotti,et al.  Chemical shifts in molecular solids by machine learning , 2018, Nature Communications.

[25]  A. Zunger Inverse design in search of materials with target functionalities , 2018 .

[26]  K. Müller,et al.  Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields , 2018, Nature Communications.

[27]  Li Li,et al.  Tensor Field Networks: Rotation- and Translation-Equivariant Neural Networks for 3D Point Clouds , 2018, ArXiv.

[28]  Alexander V. Shapeev,et al.  Accelerating crystal structure prediction by machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning , 2018, Physical Review B.

[29]  Anders S. Christensen,et al.  Alchemical and structural distribution based representation for universal quantum machine learning. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[30]  K-R Müller,et al.  SchNet - A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  George E. Dahl,et al.  Prediction Errors of Molecular Machine Learning Models Lower than Hybrid DFT Error. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  Andrea Grisafi,et al.  Symmetry-Adapted Machine Learning for Tensorial Properties of Atomistic Systems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[33]  Bing Huang,et al.  Quantum machine learning using atom-in-molecule-based fragments selected on the fly , 2017, Nature Chemistry.

[34]  Noam Bernstein,et al.  Machine learning unifies the modeling of materials and molecules , 2017, Science Advances.

[35]  Michael Gastegger,et al.  Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc02267k , 2017, Chemical science.

[36]  J. Kiefer Simultaneous Acquisition of the Polarized and Depolarized Raman Signal with a Single Detector. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[37]  Samuel S. Schoenholz,et al.  Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry , 2017, ICML.

[38]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields , 2016, Science Advances.

[39]  J S Smith,et al.  ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost , 2016, Chemical science.

[40]  Alexandre Tkatchenko,et al.  Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks , 2016, Nature Communications.

[41]  R. Bowen,et al.  Machine-learned approximations to Density Functional Theory Hamiltonians , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Li Li,et al.  Bypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning , 2016, Nature Communications.

[43]  Alexander V. Shapeev,et al.  Moment Tensor Potentials: A Class of Systematically Improvable Interatomic Potentials , 2015, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[44]  M. Rupp,et al.  Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space , 2013, 1305.7074.

[45]  Barbara Kirchner,et al.  Computing vibrational spectra from ab initio molecular dynamics. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[46]  Thomas F. Miller,et al.  Ring-polymer molecular dynamics: quantum effects in chemical dynamics from classical trajectories in an extended phase space. , 2013, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[47]  Benedetta Mennucci,et al.  Polarizable continuum model , 2012 .

[48]  J. Kästner Umbrella sampling , 2011 .

[49]  K. Müller,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[50]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Efficient stochastic thermostatting of path integral molecular dynamics. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[51]  Orlando Acevedo,et al.  Claisen rearrangements: insight into solvent effects and "on water" reactivity from QM/MM simulations. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[52]  R. Kondor,et al.  Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[53]  Joel M. Bowman,et al.  Permutationally invariant potential energy surfaces in high dimensionality , 2009 .

[54]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[55]  Walter Thiel,et al.  QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[56]  M. Gholami,et al.  A joint experimental and theoretical study of kinetic and mechanism of rearrangement of allyl p-tolyl ether , 2009 .

[57]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Accurate sampling using Langevin dynamics. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[58]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[59]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[60]  F. Weigend,et al.  Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[61]  Florian Weigend,et al.  A fully direct RI-HF algorithm: Implementation, optimised auxiliary basis sets, demonstration of accuracy and efficiency , 2002 .

[62]  V. Barone,et al.  Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model , 1999 .

[63]  K. Ruud,et al.  Ab initio Methods for the Calculation of NMR Shielding and Indirect Spin—Spin Coupling Constants , 1999 .

[64]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of NMR Shielding and Indirect Spin-Spin Coupling Constants , 1999 .

[65]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[66]  V. Barone,et al.  Quantum Calculation of Molecular Energies and Energy Gradients in Solution by a Conductor Solvent Model , 1998 .

[67]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[68]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[69]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[70]  M. Klein,et al.  Nosé-Hoover chains : the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics , 1992 .

[71]  C. Breneman,et al.  Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis , 1990 .

[72]  Cioslowski General and unique partitioning of molecular electronic properties into atomic contributions. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[73]  B. D. Rogers,et al.  Synthesis and Claisen rearrangement of alkoxyallyl enol ethers. Evidence for a dipolar transition state , 1987 .

[74]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[75]  F. L. Hirshfeld Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities , 1977 .

[76]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[77]  W. N. White,et al.  The o-Claisen rearrangement. VIII. Solvent effects , 1970 .

[78]  J. W. Tukey,et al.  The Measurement of Power Spectra from the Point of View of Communications Engineering , 1958 .

[79]  L. Onsager Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids , 1936 .

[80]  Melanie Keller,et al.  Essentials Of Computational Chemistry Theories And Models , 2016 .

[81]  V. Šablinskas,et al.  Infrared Absorption Spectra of Monohydric Alcohols , 2013 .

[82]  Frank Neese,et al.  The ORCA program system , 2012 .

[83]  Alexander B. Pacheco Introduction to Computational Chemistry , 2011 .

[84]  C. Reichardt Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry , 1988 .

[85]  K. Lau,et al.  On generalized harmonic analysis , 1980 .