The effect of phonological realization of inflectional morphology on verbal agreement in French: evidence from ERPs.

The present study examined the impact of the phonological realization of morphosyntactic agreement within the inflectional phrase (IP) in written French, as revealed by ERPs. In two independent experiments, we varied the presence vs. absence of phonological cues to morphological variation. Of interest was whether a graded ERP response to these different conditions could be found in native speakers (Experiment 1), and whether non-native learners would benefit from the presence of phonological cues (Experiment 2). The results for native French speakers showed that compared to grammatically correct instances, phonologically realized inflectional errors produced a significant P600 response, which was statistically larger than that produced by errors that were silent. German L1-French L2 learners showed similar benefits of the phonological realization of morphemes. Phonologically realized errors produced a robust P600 response whereas silent errors produced no robust effects. Implications of these results are discussed in reference to previous studies of L2 acquisition of morphosyntax.

[1]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  M. Fayol,et al.  Oral cues improve subject-verb agreement in written French , 2001 .

[3]  Yan-kit Ingrid Leung,et al.  Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish , 2004 .

[4]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Eye-movement recording as a tool for studying syntactic processing in a second language: a review of methodologies and experimental findings , 2005 .

[5]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. , 2006 .

[6]  D. Sandra,et al.  Homophonic Forms of Regularly Inflected Verbs Have Their Own Orthographic Representations: A Developmental Perspective on Spelling Errors , 2002, Brain and Language.

[7]  Lucile Chanquoy,et al.  Subject-verb agreement with present and imperfect tenses: A developmental study from 2nd to 7th grade , 2000 .

[8]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[9]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  Why Simple Verb Forms Can Be So Difficult to Spell: The Influence of Homophone Frequency and Distance in Dutch , 1999, Brain and Language.

[10]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[11]  Sensitivity to Semantic and Morphosyntactic Violations in L2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Speeded Grammaticality Judgments , 2006 .

[12]  Julia Herschensohn,et al.  The Second Time Around – Minimalism and L2 Acquisition , 2000 .

[13]  T. Münte,et al.  The influence of semantic and phonological factors on syntactic decisions: an event-related brain potential study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[14]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[15]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. , 2003 .

[16]  Andrea Krott,et al.  The Nature of Anterior Negativities Caused by Misapplications of Morphological Rules , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[18]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: a comparison of reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2001 .

[19]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Morphological Processing in a Second Language: Behavioral and Event-related Brain Potential Evidence for Storage and Decomposition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  The On-line Study of Sentence Comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond , 2004 .

[21]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  ERPs and Domain Specificity: Beating a Straw Horse , 1998 .

[23]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[24]  Kevin R. Gregg.  SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian , 2006 .

[26]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[28]  Jutta L. Mueller.  Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing , 2005 .

[29]  Julia Herschensohn,et al.  Focusing on Phonology to Teach Morphological Form in French , 2003 .

[30]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[31]  Jean Dubois.  Grammaire structurale du français : le verbe , 1967 .

[32]  J. McDonald.  Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language , 2000, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[33]  Albert Kim,et al.  Sentences in the Brain: Event-Related Potentials as Real-Time Reflections of Sentence Comprehension and Language Learning , 2004 .

[34]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.