A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.

In this paper we develop an automatic regional registration method to find corresponding masses on prior and current mammograms. The method contains three steps. In the first, we globally align both images. Then, for each mass lesion on the current view, we define a search area on the prior view, which is likely to contain the same mass lesion. Third, at each location in this search area we calculate a registration measure to quantify how well this location matches the mass lesion on the current view. Finally we select the best location. To determine the performance of our method we compare it to several other registration methods. On a dataset of 389 temporal mass pairs our method correctly links 82% of prior and current mass lesions, whereas other methods achieve at most 72%.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. , 2005, Medical physics.

[3]  E Azavedo,et al.  Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. , 2000, Acta radiologica.

[4]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  N. Wald,et al.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening , 1995, BMJ.

[6]  B Sahiner,et al.  A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis--local affine transformation for improved localization. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  C. Boggis,et al.  The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[11]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  E A Sickles,et al.  Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A comparison of methods for mammogram registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.