The energy efficiency paradox revisited through a partial observability approach

The present paper examines the energy efficiency paradox demonstrated in Greek manufacturing firms through a partial observability approach. The data set used has resulted from a survey carried out among 161 energy-saving technology firm adopters. Maximum likelihood estimates that arise from an incidental truncation model reveal that the adoption of the energy-saving technologies is indeed strongly correlated to the returns of assets that are required in order to undertake the corresponding investments. The source of the energy efficiency paradox lies within a wide range of factors. Policy schemes that aim to increase the adoption rate of energy-saving technologies within the field of manufacturing are significantly affected by differences in the size of firms. Finally, mixed policies seem to be more effective than policies that are only capital subsidy or regulation oriented.

[1]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Optimal timing problems in environmental economics , 2002 .

[2]  G. Reid The state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms: Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge, (Small Business Research Centre, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9DE, 1992) p. 87 , 1993 .

[3]  D. Bloom,et al.  Correcting for Truncation Bias Caused by a Latent Truncation Variable , 1984 .

[4]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[5]  J. Barney Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[6]  Chulho Jung,et al.  Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives , 1996 .

[7]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[8]  J. Bain Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[9]  C. Wren THE BUILD‐UP AND DURATION OF SUBSIDY‐INDUCED EMPLOYMENT EVIDENCE FROM U.K. REGIONAL POLICY* , 1994 .

[10]  R. Baptista The Diffusion of Process Innovations: A Selective Review , 1999 .

[11]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[12]  John J. McGowan,et al.  On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits , 1983 .

[13]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  The adoption of energy-efficiency enhancing technologies.: Market performance and policy strategies in case of heterogeneous firms , 2003 .

[15]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[16]  Other Energy policies of IEA countries: Greece 2002 review , 2003 .

[17]  Alan H. Sanstad,et al.  DISCOUNT RATES AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 1995 .

[18]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Empirical studies in industrial organization : essays in honor of Leonard W. Weiss , 1992 .

[19]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[20]  J. W. Velthuijsen Incentives for investment in energy efficiency: an econometric evaluation and policy implications , 1993 .

[21]  H. McFarland Evaluating q as an Alternative to the Rate of Return in Measuring Profitability , 1988 .

[22]  Paul Dunne,et al.  Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s , 1994 .

[23]  D. Skuras,et al.  The Effects of Regional Capital Subsidies on Productivity Growth: A Case Study of the Greek Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[24]  Marilyn A Brown,et al.  Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy , 1990 .

[25]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  The Determinants of Technology Adoption: The Case of the Banking Firm , 1984 .

[26]  A. Blackman,et al.  Community Pressure and Clean Technology in the Informal Sector: An Econometric Analysis of the Adoption of Propane by Traditional Mexican Brickmakers , 1998 .

[27]  Margaret E. Slade,et al.  Competing models of firm profitability , 2004 .

[28]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Informal Regulation of Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  R. Sutherland Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments , 1991 .

[30]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[31]  Gilbert E. Metcalf,et al.  Energy conservation investment: Do consumers discount the future correctly? , 1993 .

[32]  A. Lovins,et al.  Least-Cost Climatic Stabilization , 1991 .

[33]  M. Hirschey Mergers, Buyouts and Fakeouts , 1986 .

[34]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of energy efficient technologies and carbon abatement: the electricity generating sector in India , 2001 .

[35]  Ana Paula Faria,et al.  Determinants of adoption of flexible production technologies: Evidence from portuguese manufacturing industry , 2002 .

[36]  G. Schwert Using Financial Data to Measure Effects of Regulation , 1981, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[37]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  On the irrelevance of replacement cost disclosures for security prices , 1980 .

[38]  Henk Folmer,et al.  Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics , 2000 .

[39]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[40]  Avraham Shama,et al.  Energy conservation in US buildings: Solving the high potential/low adoption paradox from a behavioural perspective , 1983 .

[41]  D. Audretsch Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1995 .

[42]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation , 2001 .

[43]  Allen M. Weiss The Effects of Expectations on Technology Adoption: Some Empirical Evidence , 1994 .

[44]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  The economic analysis of technology policy , 1987 .

[45]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  RANK, STOCK, ORDER AND EPIDEMIC EFFECTS IN THE DIFFUSION OF NEW PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES: AN EMPIRICAL MODEL , 1993 .

[46]  Holger Ernst,et al.  The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry , 1997 .

[47]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  On economic disequilibrium and free lunch , 1994 .

[48]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Specification Error in Probit Models , 1985 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal Strategic Management and the Exploration of Diversity , 1995 .

[50]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Energy Saving by Firms, Decision-Making, Barriers and Policies , 2001 .

[51]  Takehiko Yasuda Firm Growth, Size, Age and Behavior in Japanese Manufacturing , 2005 .

[52]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  A fresh look at industry and market analysis , 2002 .

[53]  Riccardo Lucchetti,et al.  The Adoption of ICT among SMEs: Evidence from an Italian Survey , 2004 .

[54]  Mark Hirschey,et al.  Market Structure and Market Value , 1985 .

[55]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments , 1993 .

[56]  W. E. Watkins,et al.  Investment in Energy Efficiency: Do the Characteristics of Firms Matter? , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[57]  Robert Jacobson,et al.  The Validity of ROI as a Measure of Business Performance , 1987 .

[58]  M. Hirschey,et al.  Ownership structure and profitability , 1992 .

[59]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime , 1991 .

[60]  Raymond J. Kopp,et al.  Technology Adoption and Aggregate Energy Efficiency , 2002 .

[61]  R. Howarth,et al.  ‘Normal’ markets, market imperfections and energy efficiency , 1994 .

[62]  M. Rogers,et al.  A dynamic panel analysis of the profitability of Australian tax entities , 2005 .

[63]  Erwin H. Bulte,et al.  Does the Energy-Efficiency Paradox Exist? Technological Progress and Uncertainty , 2001 .

[64]  P. Joskow,et al.  The Diffusion of New Technologies: Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry , 1988 .

[65]  David J. Teece,et al.  INTERNAL ORGANIZATION AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROFITABILITY OF PRINCIPAL FIRMS* , 1981 .

[66]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries , 1996 .

[67]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[68]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Capital Commitment and Profitability: An Empirical Investigation , 1986 .

[69]  Paul A. David,et al.  Adoption Subsidies vs Information Provision as Instruments of Technology Policy , 1986 .

[70]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments , 1998 .

[71]  Edmar Luiz Fagundes de Almeida,et al.  Energy efficiency and the limits of market forces: The example of the electric motor market in France , 1998 .

[72]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  An Econometric Model of Production with Endogenous Improvement in Energy Efficiency 1970-1995 , 1998 .

[73]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .