The knowledge-bridging role of Technical and Scientific Services in knowledge-intensive industries

Technical and Scientific Services (TSS) have been largely acknowledged by scholars and policy makers as means of knowledge transfer and diffusion within an innovation system. The paper argues that TSS play a critical technology bridging function especially in knowledge-intensive industries, significantly contributing to their development and growth. This issue is investigated through an extensive analysis of the Italian biotech and nanotech industries. The results demonstrate that TSS actually serve as technology bridges along the stages of the technology-intensive industry's life cycle, connecting sources of technical knowledge (e.g. universities) with recipient organisations (e.g. large private companies), that use the transferred technology to innovate their products or services. The major achievement is that TSS do not play just a brokering function; they perform on the acquired technology value-added activities (i.e. personalisation or recombination) the recipient organisations are willing to pay for, thus ensuring the sustainability of the TSS firm business model.

[1]  Maxine Robertson,et al.  Knowledge Creation in Professional Service Firms: Institutional Effects , 2003 .

[2]  Marja,et al.  Knowledge-intensive Business Services in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[3]  Johan Hauknes,et al.  Services in innovation - Innovation in services , 1998 .

[4]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Managing and organising technical and scientific service companies: a conceptual framework and an empirical study , 2005 .

[5]  Charles Despres,et al.  Organisational logic in the new age of business: the case example of knowledge management at Valtech , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Technology, globalisation and economic performance , 1997 .

[7]  Giulio Cainelli,et al.  From the industrial district to the district group: An insight into the evolution of capitalism in italy1 , 2002 .

[8]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Survey research. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Deb Chatterji,et al.  Benefiting from External Sources of Technology , 1993 .

[10]  A. Macpherson,et al.  A Comparison of Within‐Firm and External Sources of Product Innovation , 1997 .

[11]  M. Fontes.  The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs , 2005 .

[12]  Alan W. Pearson,et al.  The development of networks between engineering contractors and their clients: the special case of partnering , 1996 .

[13]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[14]  Norvig Larsen Jacob.  Supplier-User Interaction in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Types of Expertise and Modes of Organization , 2019, Services and the Knowledge-Based Economy.

[15]  Christiane Hipp,et al.  Information Flows and Knowledge Creation in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Scheme for a Conceptualization , 2000 .

[16]  David Wilemon,et al.  Strategic Partnering for Developing New Products , 1996 .

[17]  Poh Kam Wong,et al.  A comparative study of innovation behaviour in Singapore's KIBS and manufacturing firms , 2005 .

[18]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[19]  A. Zenker,et al.  Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems , 2001 .

[20]  V. Grover,et al.  An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory , 1998 .

[21]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Biotechnology clusters, "Big Pharma" and the knowledge-driven economy , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[22]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Knowledge Intensive, Technical and Other Services: Patterns of Competitiveness and Innovation Compared , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[23]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  How to use qualitative methods in evaluation , 1987 .

[24]  T. A. Bryant,et al.  Technology brokers in the North American software industry: getting the most out of mismatched dyads , 1998 .

[25]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective , 2002 .

[26]  Anna Nosella,et al.  Characteristics of the Italian biotechnology industry and new business models: the initial results of an empirical study , 2005 .

[27]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[28]  John Wilkinson.  The role of technology transfer in biotechnology , 2001 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  Andrew B. Hargadon.  Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[31]  P. Hertog,et al.  Knowledge-intensive business services: users, carriers and sources of innovation , 1995 .

[32]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[33]  T. Turpin,et al.  Bricoleurs and boundary riders: managing basic research and innovation knowledge networks , 1996 .

[34]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[35]  R. Grant.  Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[36]  Dale Littler,et al.  Success factors for collaborative product development: a study of suppliers of information and communication technology , 1995 .

[37]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[38]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The (Failed) Development of a Biotechnology Cluster: The Case of Lombardy , 2001 .

[39]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation , 2003 .

[40]  Paolo Guerrieri,et al.  Industrial Districts’ Evolution and Technological Regimes: Italy and Taiwan , 2004 .

[41]  Davide Chiaroni,et al.  Industrial Clusters In Biotechnology , 2004 .

[42]  Deb Chatterji,et al.  Accessing External Sources of Technology , 1996 .

[43]  G. Haour.  Stretching the knowledge‐base of the enterprise through contract research , 1992 .

[44]  Wei Xiong,et al.  Interactive relationship between KIBS and knowledge environment , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[45]  Erik Knol.  Nanotechnology and business opportunities: scenarios as awareness instrument , 2004 .

[46]  Paul Windrum,et al.  Knowledge-intensive Services and International Competitiveness: A Four Country Comparison , 1999 .

[47]  Julian Lowe,et al.  R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets , 1998 .

[48]  Emmanuel Muller.  Innovation interactions between knowledge-intensive business services and small and medium-sized enterprises : an analysis in terms of evolution, knowledge and territories , 2001 .

[49]  Mike Wright,et al.  The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications , 2005 .

[50]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[51]  J. Howells.  Research and Technology Outsourcing , 1999 .

[52]  Knut Koschatzky,et al.  The regional embeddedness of small manufacturing and service firms: regional networking as knowledge source for innovation? , 1999 .

[53]  F. Brioschi,et al.  From the Industrial District to the District Group . An Insight into the Evolution of Local Capitalism in Italy * , 2001 .

[54]  Kelvin W. Willoughby,et al.  The Affordable Resources strategy and the Milieux Embeddedness strategy as alternative approaches to facilitating innovation in a knowledge-intensive industry , 2004 .

[55]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[56]  A. Macpherson,et al.  The contribution of external service inputs to the product development efforts of small manufacturing firms , 1997 .

[57]  C W.H.,et al.  Nanotechnology and business opportunities : scenarios as awareness instrument , 2005 .

[58]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[59]  A. Macpherson,et al.  The role of external technical support in the innovation performance of scientific instruments firms: empirical evidence from New York State , 1997 .

[60]  G. D. N. Worswick,et al.  The Service Economy. , 1969 .

[61]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .