Test results are presented for the HPOTP Turbine Interstage Seal with both the current and an alternate, aerodynamically designed, swirl brake. Tests were conducted at speeds out to 16,000 rpm, supply pressures up to 18.3 bars, and the following three inlet tangential velocity conditions: (1) no preswirl; (2) intermediate preswirl in the direction of rotation; and (3) high preswirl in the direction of rotation. The back pressure can be controlled independently and was varied to yield the following four pressure ratios: 0.4, 0.45, 0.56, and 0.67. The central and simplest conclusion to be obtained from the test series is that the alternate swirl brake consistently outperforms the current swirl brake in terms of stability performance. The alternate swirl brake's whirl frequency ratio was generally about one half or less than corresponding values for the current design. In many cases, the alternate design yielded negative whirl frequency ratio values in comparison to positive values for the current design. The alternate design can be directly substituted into the space currently occupied by the current design. There is no change in leakage performance.
[1]
J. Wachter,et al.
Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Application in Rotor Dynamics
,
1980
.
[2]
Dara W. Childs,et al.
Theory versus experiment for the rotordynamic coefficients of annular gas seals. Part 1: Test facility and apparatus
,
1986
.
[3]
Dara W. Childs,et al.
Annular honeycomb seals: test results for leakage and rotordynamic coefficients. Comparisons to labyrinth and smooth configurations
,
1989
.
[4]
Dara W. Childs,et al.
Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficient of Labyrinth Gas Seals: Part II—A Comparison to Experiment
,
1988
.
[5]
D. J. Ewins,et al.
Modal Testing: Theory and Practice
,
1984
.