Open Science 2.0: How Research and Education Can Benefit from Open Innovation and Web 2.0

Both, Open Innovation and Web 2.0, are concepts used in commerce in order to support the collaboration of different people and the emergence of new ideas. The approaches can be adapted to science, thus offering new opportunities for research and education. If necessary requirements are satisfied, Open Science 2.0 facilitates e.g. the public development of scientific papers and the conduct of public seminars, both harnessing collective intelligence. This way, it is not only possible to improve the individual outcomes, but also to encourage the exchange between theory and practice.

[1]  Chris Anderson,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[2]  E. Leahey,et al.  Collaborative Research in Sociology: Trends and Contributing Factors , 2008 .

[3]  Patricia E. Gaynor,et al.  Determinants of Scholarly Productivity among Male and Female Economists , 2003 .

[4]  Michael Kerres,et al.  Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen , 2006 .

[5]  Wilhelm von Humboldt,et al.  Über die innere und äussere Organisation der höheren wissenschaftlichen Anstalten in Berlin , 2010 .

[6]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[7]  K. Popper,et al.  Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde , 1957 .

[8]  G. Jouret.  Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea , 2009 .

[9]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Neue Ideenquellen erschließen — Die Chancen von Open Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  Christian Spannagel,et al.  Öffentliche Seminare im Web 2.0 , 2009, DeLFI Workshops.

[11]  Francis T. Cullen,et al.  How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science , 1998, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[12]  Guntram Geser,et al.  OLCOS Roadmap 2012 , 2007 .

[13]  Gottfried Vossen,et al.  Unleashing Web 2.0: From concepts to creativity , 2007, UBIQ.

[14]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[15]  C. Fuchs.  Don Tapscott & Anthony D. Williams: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2008 .

[16]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[17]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Action Research and New Media - Concepts, Methods, and Cases , 2008, New media: policy and social research issues.

[18]  Peter Suber.  Open Access Overview , 2012 .

[19]  Tibor Braun,et al.  International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields, 1981–1985 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[20]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[21]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[22]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[23]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[24]  Thomas W. Pike.  Collaboration networks and scientific impact among behavioral ecologists , 2010 .

[25]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft , 1992 .