Friction of viscoelastic elastomers with rough surfaces under torsional contact conditions.

Frictional properties of contacts between a smooth viscoelastic rubber and rigid surfaces are investigated using a torsional contact configuration where a glass lens is continuously rotated on the rubber surface. From the inversion of the displacement field measured at the surface of the rubber, spatially resolved values of the steady state frictional shear stress are determined within the nonhomogeneous pressure and velocity fields of the contact. For contacts with a smooth lens, a velocity-dependent but pressure-independent local shear stress is retrieved from the inversion. On the other hand, the local shear stress is found to depend on both velocity and applied contact pressure when a randomly rough (sand-blasted) glass lens is rubbed against the rubber surface. As a result of changes in the density of microasperity contacts, the amount of light transmitted by the transparent multicontact interface is observed to vary locally as a function of both contact pressure and sliding velocity. Under the assumption that the intensity of light transmitted by the rough interface is proportional to the proportion of area into contact, it is found that the local frictional stress can be expressed experimentally as the product of a purely velocity-dependent term, k(v), by a term representing the pressure and velocity dependence of the actual contact area, A/A(0). A comparison between k(v) and the frictional shear stress of smooth contacts suggests that nanometer scale dissipative processes occurring at the interface predominate over viscoelastic dissipation at microasperity scale.

[1]  N. Spencer,et al.  Friction of Rubber with Surfaces Patterned with Rigid Spherical Asperities , 2017, Tribology Letters.

[2]  F. Lequeux,et al.  High frequency linear rheology of complex fluids measured from their surface thermal fluctuations , 2013 .

[3]  I. Etsion Discussion of the Paper: Optical In Situ Micro Tribometer for Analysis of Real Contact Area for Contact Mechanics, Adhesion, and Sliding Experiments , 2012, Tribology letter.

[4]  B. Persson,et al.  Rubber friction: Comparison of theory with experiment , 2011, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[5]  F. Lequeux,et al.  High bandwidth linear viscoelastic properties of complex fluids from the measurement of their free surface fluctuations , 2011 .

[6]  E. Barthel,et al.  Glass strengthening by polymeric coatings: combined effect of mechanical properties and confinement , 2011 .

[7]  A. Chateauminois,et al.  Surface Pressure and Shear Stress Fields within a Frictional Contact on Rubber , 2011 .

[8]  B. Persson Rolling friction for hard cylinder and sphere on viscoelastic solid , 2010, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[9]  Christian Fretigny,et al.  Friction and shear fracture of an adhesive contact under torsion. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  A. Chateauminois,et al.  Local Friction at a Sliding Interface between an Elastomer and a Rigid Spherical Probe , 2022 .

[11]  J. Scheibert Mécanique du contact aux échelles mésoscopiques , 2007 .

[12]  M. Müser,et al.  Contact mechanics of real vs. randomly rough surfaces: A Green's function molecular dynamics study , 2007 .

[13]  J. Fineberg,et al.  Contact area measurements reveal loading-history dependence of static friction. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[14]  B. Persson Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces , 2006, cond-mat/0603807.

[15]  J. Fineberg,et al.  Crack-like processes governing the onset of frictional slip , 2006, cond-mat/0603528.

[16]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  The Effects of Molecular Weight and Temperature on the Kinetic Friction of Silicone Rubbers , 2003 .

[17]  B. Persson Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics , 2001 .

[18]  J. Dieterich,et al.  IMAGING SURFACE CONTACTS : POWER LAW CONTACT DISTRIBUTIONS AND CONTACT STRESSES IN QUARTZ, CALCITE, GLASS AND ACRYLIC PLASTIC , 1996 .

[19]  J. Dieterich,et al.  Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state-dependent properties , 1994 .

[20]  A. I. Leonov,et al.  On the Theory of Adhesive Friction of Elastomers , 1985 .

[21]  J. Golden Hysteresis and lubricated rubber friction , 1980 .

[22]  Richard Schapery,et al.  Analytical Models for the Deformation and Adhesion Components of Rubber Friction , 1978 .

[23]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[24]  K. A. Grosch,et al.  The Relation between the Friction and Viscoelastic Properties of Rubber , 1964 .

[25]  A. Schallamach A theory of dynamic rubber friction , 1963 .

[26]  D. Tabor,et al.  The Friction of Hard Sliders on Lubricated Rubber: The Importance of Deformation Losses , 1958 .

[27]  W. Sawyer,et al.  Optical In Situ Micro Tribometer for Analysis of Real Contact Area for Contact Mechanics, Adhesion, and Sliding Experiments , 2011, Tribology Letters.