Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Case Study of Textile Studies

The scarcity of readily usable instruments to resea rch learning in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) environments has posed a great challenge to devise appropriate analytical tools to investigate how individuals change their u nderstanding or create a new personal construction of knowledge as a result of social intera ction and negotiation within the group. Given this scenario, the Activity System Model (Engestrom, 1987), based on a socio-cultural perspective, was adopted as a framework for analysing the quality of a CSCL community in this research project. Data were analysed to examine how interactivity had contributed to the fostering of higher order thinking skills in the CSCL community. Findings of this study confirmed that there was a positive correlation between the quality of collaborative pr ocess engaged by groups and the quality of cognitive skills fostered. High levels of social in teraction and collaboration contributed to the establishment of a community of learning, nurturing a space for fostering higher order thinking through co-creation of knowledge processes. Lessons learnt and limitations of the investigation in this study in light of the methodological issues re lating to coding reliability and difficulties in translating Chinese text involved in the CSCL for c omputerized coding process were discussed as well.

[1]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Students' experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[4]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[6]  Rose M. Marra,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols , 2004 .

[7]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Web-Supported Emergent-Collaboration In Higher Education Courses , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[9]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Group awareness widgets for enhancing social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: design and implementation , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[10]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[11]  V. Lally,et al.  Deciphering Individual Learning Processes in Virtual Professional Development , 2002 .

[12]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Content analysis: What are they talking about? , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums , 2003 .

[15]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  Network and content analysis in an online community discourse , 2002, CSCL.

[16]  Donald C. Bryant,et al.  Content Analysis of Communications , 1968 .

[17]  R. Gillies.  The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning , 2004 .

[18]  Kayleigh Carabajal,et al.  Critical Analysis of Models and Methods Used To Evaluate Online Learning Networks. , 2001 .

[19]  David Miller,et al.  A framework for evaluating computer supported collaborative learning , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..