Sound Categories: Category Formation and Evidence-Based Taxonomies

Five evidence-based taxonomies of everyday sounds frequently reported in the soundscape literature have been generated. An online sorting and category-labeling method that elicits rather than prescribes descriptive words was used. A total of N = 242 participants took part. The main categories of the soundscape taxonomy were people, nature, and manmade, with each dividing into further categories. Sounds within the nature and manmade categories, and two further individual sound sources, dogs, and engines, were explored further by repeating the procedure using multiple exemplars. By generating multidimensional spaces containing both sounds and the spontaneously generated descriptive words the procedure allows for the interpretation of the psychological dimensions along which sounds are organized. This reveals how category formation is based upon different cues – sound source-event identification, subjective-states, and explicit assessment of the acoustic signal – in different contexts. At higher levels of the taxonomy the majority of words described sound source-events. In contrast, when categorizing dog sounds a greater proportion of the words described subjective-states, and valence and arousal scores of these words correlated with their coordinates along the first two dimensions of the data. This is consistent with valence and arousal judgments being the primary categorization strategy used for dog sounds. In contrast, when categorizing engine sounds a greater proportion of the words explicitly described the acoustic signal. The coordinates of sounds along the first two dimensions were found to correlate with fluctuation strength and sharpness, consistent with explicit assessment of acoustic signal features underlying category formation for engine sounds. By eliciting descriptive words the method makes explicit the subjective meaning of these judgments based upon valence and arousal and acoustic properties, and the results demonstrate distinct strategies being spontaneously used to categorize different types of sounds.

[1]  C. Osgood The nature and measurement of meaning. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  佐藤 保,et al.  Principal Components , 2021, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.

[3]  C. Osgood On the whys and wherefores of E, P, and A. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[5]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[6]  E. A. Bjork The perceived quality of natural sounds , 1985 .

[7]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[8]  R. M. Schafer,et al.  The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World , 1993 .

[9]  J. Ballas Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds , 1993 .

[10]  D. Dubois Categories as Acts of Meaning: The Case of Categories in Olfaction and Audition , 1999 .

[11]  M. Marcell,et al.  Confrontation Naming of Environmental Sounds , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[12]  François Pachet,et al.  A taxonomy of musical genres , 2000, RIAO.

[13]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Similarity and Categorization , 2001 .

[14]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  The perceptual dimensionality of environmental sounds , 2003 .

[15]  J. Russell Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[16]  Takaya Kojima,et al.  Personal evaluation structure of environmental sounds: Experiments of subjective evaluation using subjects' own terms , 2004 .

[17]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  Automatic emotional speech classification , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[19]  Tao Li,et al.  Music genre classification with taxonomy , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[20]  Kazunori Hokao,et al.  Applying the methods of image evaluation and spatial analysis to study the sound environment of urban street areas , 2005 .

[21]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Distinct Cortical Pathways for Processing Tool versus Animal Sounds , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Guastavino The ideal urban soundscape : Investigating the sound quality of french cities , 2006 .

[23]  D. Dubois,et al.  A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes : Using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories , 2006 .

[24]  Catherine Guastavino,et al.  Categorization of environmental sounds. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[25]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Katherine N. Irvine,et al.  People's perceptions and classifications of sounds heard in urban parks: semantics, affect and restoration , 2007 .

[27]  H. Nahvi,et al.  Index for vehicle acoustical comfort inside a passenger car , 2008 .

[28]  Neil C. Bruce,et al.  An activity-centric conceptual framework for assessing and creating positive urban soundscapes , 2008 .

[29]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[30]  Julie Josse,et al.  Principal component methods - hierarchical clustering - partitional clustering: why would we need to choose for visualizing data? , 2010 .

[31]  Mei Zhang,et al.  Semantic differential analysis of the soundscape in urban open public spaces , 2010 .

[32]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Hearing living symbols and nonliving icons: Category specificities in the cognitive processing of environmental sounds , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  B. Berglund,et al.  A principal components model of soundscape perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Jian Kang,et al.  Towards standardization in soundscape preference assessment , 2011 .

[35]  G. Lemaitre,et al.  A lexical analysis of environmental sound categories. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[36]  Catherine Marquis-Favre,et al.  Road Traffic in Urban Areas: A Perceptual and Cognitive Typology of Pass-By Noises , 2012 .

[37]  Paul Jennings,et al.  The development and application of the emotional dimensions of a soundscape , 2013 .

[38]  Ming Yang,et al.  Psychoacoustical evaluation of natural and urban sounds in soundscapes. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  G. Lemaitre,et al.  Evidence for a basic level in a taxonomy of everyday action sounds , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[41]  Yan Song Wang,et al.  A sound quality model for objective synthesis evaluation of vehicle interior noise based on artificial neural network , 2014 .

[42]  Justin Salamon,et al.  A Dataset and Taxonomy for Urban Sound Research , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[43]  Teresa López de la Vieja A Cognitive Approach , 2015 .

[44]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Influence of urban contexts on soundscape perceptions: A structural equation modeling approach , 2015 .

[45]  Karol J. Piczak ESC: Dataset for Environmental Sound Classification , 2015, ACM Multimedia.

[46]  Ana Tajadura-Jiménez,et al.  Auditory-Induced Emotion Mediates Perceptual Categorization of Everyday Sounds , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Jian Kang,et al.  Development of Indicators for the Soundscape in Urban Shopping Streets , 2016 .

[48]  Philippe Pasquier,et al.  Automatic Soundscape Affect Recognition Using A Dimensional Approach , 2016 .

[49]  S. Jordà,et al.  Rhythm Spaces , 2016 .

[50]  PerMagnus Lindborg,et al.  A taxonomy of sound sources in restaurants , 2016 .