Sourcing strategies for a capacitated firm subject to supply and demand uncertainty

We study sourcing strategies for a capacitated manufacturer subject to supply and demand uncertainty. The manufacturer produces two products: low- and high-quality versions of the same product that differ in only one critical component. For the low-quality product, one supplier of the critical component is unreliable, failing to deliver ordered components with some positive probability. To mitigate the risk associated with the unreliable supplier, the manufacturer may: i) order from a perfectly reliable, but expensive secondary supplier (i.e., dual sourcing); ii) produce some or all of the component in-house (i.e., concurrent sourcing); or iii) substitute a higher quality component (i.e., downward substitution). All production activities share a limited capacity resource. We develop a stochastic programming formulation in a single period setting to study the optimal combination of these sourcing tactics, which we refer to as sourcing strategies, under a variety of conditions. An extensive screening experiment reveals that five of the 63 possible sourcing strategies occur as the optimal sourcing strategy in nearly 75% of problem instances. Additional experiments provide insight into the impact of limited capacity, the value of each available sourcing option, and the evolution of the optimal sourcing strategy as key problem parameters change. Most interestingly, our experiments reveal that the ability to produce a component in-house is a highly effective means for mitigating supply and demand uncertainty in a wide range of problem environments.

[1]  N. P. Mols How does concurrent sourcing affect performance , 2010 .

[2]  Xiao-Feng Shao,et al.  Yield management with downward substitution and uncertainty demand in semiconductor manufacturing , 2012 .

[4]  Christina L. Ahmadjian,et al.  Keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry , 2000 .

[5]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Multi-product inventory planning with downward substitution, stochastic demand and setup costs , 2004 .

[6]  R. Akella,et al.  Diversification under supply uncertainty , 1993 .

[7]  Jian Yang,et al.  A Production-Inventory System with Markovian Capacity and Outsourcing Option , 2005, Oper. Res..

[8]  William Ho,et al.  Supply chain risk management: a literature review , 2015 .

[9]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Delegation vs. Control of Component Procurement Under Asymmetric Cost Information and Simple Contracts , 2013, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[10]  Christopher S. Tang Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[11]  Bin Hu,et al.  Managing Supply Disruptions when Sourcing from Reliable and Unreliable Suppliers , 2015 .

[12]  Osman Alp,et al.  Tactical capacity management under capacity flexibility , 2008 .

[13]  Stuart X. Zhu Dynamic replenishment from two sources with different yields, costs, and leadtimes , 2015 .

[14]  Anne Parmigiani,et al.  Why Do Firms Both Make and Buy? An Investigation of Concurrent Sourcing , 2007 .

[15]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Quantity commitment, production and subcontracting with bargaining , 2009 .

[16]  Amanda J. Schmitt,et al.  OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review , 2014 .

[17]  Yehuda Bassok,et al.  Random Yield and Random Demand in a Production System with Downward Substitution , 1999, Oper. Res..

[18]  O. Kaya,et al.  Outsourcing vs. in-house production: a comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand , 2011 .