Comparative Analysis of Unconditional and Conditional Priority for Use at Isolated Signalized Intersections

Conditional priority is recognized as having the potential to improve transit service reliability at small cost to general traffic. The popular preference for conditional priority over unconditional priority encounters the challenges of various and challenging test scenarios. This paper makes a comparative analysis of unconditional and conditional priority in terms of intersection performance, based on the logic rule-based bus rapid transit signal priority (BRTSP), an active transit signal priority (TSP) for use at isolated signalized intersections with median bus-only lanes. Compared to previous study, the design of phase scheme, including two BRT phases, eight vehicle phases and four pedestrian phases, and the technical framework of BRTSP, centered on four categories of logic rules, have been improved to incorporate a mechanism for providing phase insertion, a special signal priority treatment in addition to green extension and early green. Phase insertion detector, if phase insertion is desired, is installed on the bus-only lane between check-in and check-out detector to trigger phase insertion request. A new category of logic rules, i.e., rules for early green response, is introduced into as a component of BRTSP to dynamically alter the response of the vehicle phases conflicting with the BRT phases to early green request. Inductive loop detector placed on each lane of the vehicle phases is used to monitor time headway and occupancy time on a lane by lane basis. The simulation experimental results indicated that: (1) phase insertion contributed substantially to late schedule deviations correction, but was recommended to be embedded in conditional priority rather than unconditional priority; (2) there was lack of convincing evidence that conditional priority had an inherent effectiveness of managing the intersection performance by varying the lateness criterion; (3) at TSP-enabled isolated intersections with green extension and early green, compared to having conditional priority, having an integration of unconditional priority and holding early BRT vehicles at control points may be a cost-effective solution not only to improve schedule adherence but also to accommodate the benefits of general traffic; and (4) at TSP-enabled isolated intersections with green extension, early green and phase insertion, there seemed to be a pressing need to move from unconditional priority to conditional priority.

[1]  Francois Dion,et al.  Evaluation of Service Reliability Impacts of Traffic Signal Priority Strategies for Bus Transit , 2003 .

[2]  Peter G Furth,et al.  Conditional Bus Priority at Signalized Intersections: Better Service with Less Traffic Disruption , 2000 .

[3]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Transit Signal Priority Impacts on Operation of a Signalized Intersection , 2004 .

[4]  Hongfeng Xu,et al.  Impact of Phase Scheme on Development and Performance of a Logic Rule-Based Bus Rapid Transit Signal Priority , 2009 .

[5]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Control Strategies for Transit Priority , 1998 .

[6]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Analysis of Transit Signal Priority Using Archived TriMet Bus Dispatch System Data , 2005 .

[7]  Jennifer Flynn,et al.  Transit ridership, reliability, and retention. , 2008 .

[8]  Albert Gan,et al.  Performance of Transit Signal Priority with Queue Jumper Lanes , 2005 .

[9]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF BUS TRANSIT SERVICE , 1981 .

[10]  Brendon Hemily,et al.  Transit Signal Priority (TSP): A Planning and Implementation Handbook , 2005 .

[11]  Herbert S. Levinson The Reliability of Transit Service: An historical Perspective , 2005 .

[12]  Albert Gan,et al.  Determination of Optimal Detector Location for Transit Signal Priority with Queue Jumper Lanes , 2006 .

[13]  Zong Tian,et al.  Green Extension and Traffic Detection Schemes at Signalized Intersections , 2006 .

[14]  Ruey Long Cheu,et al.  Simulation evaluation of route-based control of bus operations , 2002 .

[15]  R. J. Baker,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY , 2002 .