Adaptable, Personalizable and Multi User Museum Exhibits

Two dimensional paintings were exhibited in museums and art galleries in the same manner since at least three centuries. However, the emergence of novel interactive technologies provides the opportunity to change this status quo. By 2006, according to the Institute for Museum and Library Services, 43 % of museum visits in the U.S. were remote. According to the Institute for the Future, “Emerging technologies are transforming everything that constitutes our notion of “reality” – our ability to sense our surroundings, our capacity to reason, our perception of the world”. In the present age, that technology is becoming mixed to the fabric of reality to offer novel experiences in Cultural Heritage Institutions. This work presents the design and implementation of a technological framework based on ambient intelligence to enhance visitor experiences within Heritage Institutions by augmenting two dimensional paintings. Among the major contributions of this chapter is the support of personalized multi user access to exhibits, facilitating also adaptation mechanisms for altering the interaction style and content based on the requirements of each Heritage Institution’s visitor. A standards compliant knowledge representation and the appropriate authoring tools guarantee the effective integration of this approach in any relevant context. The developed applications have been deployed within a simulation space of the FORTH-ICS AmI facility and evaluated by users in the context of a pilot study.

[1]  John J. Koran,et al.  Predicting Visitor Behavior , 2010 .

[2]  G. Antoniou,et al.  A Semantics-Based User Model for the Support of Personalized, Context-Aware Navigational Services , 2008, 2008 First International Workshop on Ontologies in Interactive Systems.

[3]  Tim Mansfield,et al.  Designing an immersive environment for public use , 2006, PDC '06.

[4]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Unified user interface development: the software engineering of universally accessible interactions , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[5]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Interactive spatial multimedia for communication of art in the physical museum space , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[6]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  A Decision-making Specification Language for Verifiable User-interface Adaptation Logic , 2005, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  A Development Toolkit for Unified Web-Based User Interfaces , 2008, ICCHP.

[8]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Shaping experiences in the hunt museum: a design case study , 2004, DIS '04.

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[10]  Adamantios Koumpis,et al.  Decision making in intelligent user interfaces , 1997, IUI '97.

[11]  Oliver Bimber,et al.  Superimposing Pictorial Artwork with Projected Imagery , 2005, IEEE Multim..

[12]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS IN AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE ENVIRONMENTS , 2012, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics.

[13]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings , 2006, OZCHI.

[14]  Maria Economou,et al.  Promising Beginning? Evaluating Museum Mobile Phone Apps , 2011 .

[15]  B. Serrell Paying Attention: Visitors and Museum Exhibitions , 1998 .

[16]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Middleware for Ambient Intelligence Environments: Reviewing Requirements and Communication Technologies , 2009, HCI.