Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment

At the request of the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Research Council (NRC) recently completed a major report entitled Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. The terms of reference for this report were to develop a long-range vision and strategic plan to advance the practices of toxicity testing and human health assessment of environmental agents. The report describes how current and anticipated scientific advances can be expected to transform toxicity testing to permit broader coverage of the universe of potentially toxic chemicals to which humans may be exposed, using more timely and more cost-effective methods for toxicity testing. The report envisages greatly expanded use of high- and medium-throughput in vitro screening assays, computational toxicology, and systems biology, along with other emerging high-content testing methodologies, such as functional genomics and transcriptomics. When fully implemented, the vision will transform the ways toxicity testing and chemical risk assessment are conducted, moving away from measuring apical health endpoints in experimental animals toward identification of significant perturbations of toxicity pathways using in vitro tests in human cells and cell lines. Population-based studies incorporating relevant biomarkers will also be useful in identifying pathway perturbations directly in humans and in interpreting the results of in vitro tests in the context of human health risk assessment. The present article summarizes and extends the NRC report and examines its implications for risk assessment practice.

[1]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling : Science and Applications , 2005 .

[2]  Adam Yasgar,et al.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Compound Cytotoxicity Profiling Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[5]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. , 2007, Mutation research.

[6]  T. Insel,et al.  NIH Molecular Libraries Initiative , 2004, Science.

[7]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  Hugh A Barton,et al.  Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment: A Multisector Approach to the Modernization of Human Safety Requirements , 2006, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[10]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  A Cell-Based PDE4 Assay in 1536-Well Plate Format for High-Throughput Screening , 2008, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[11]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Molecular circuits, biological switches, and nonlinear dose-response relationships. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[13]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[14]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  The integration of data on physico-chemical properties, in vitro-derived toxicity data and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic as modelling a tool in hazard and risk assessment. A commentary. , 2003, Toxicology letters.