Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Tetsuo Kawahara,et al. Effect of Active Exploration of 3-D Object Views on the View-Matching Process in Object Recognition , 2010, Perception.
[2] Frank Meijer,et al. Active exploration improves perceptual sensitivity for virtual 3D objects in visual recognition tasks , 2011, Vision Research.
[3] D. Foster,et al. Recognizing novel three–dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[4] Guy Wallis,et al. Learning Illumination-and Orientation-invariant Representations of Objects through Temporal Association General Methods Experiment Ii , 2022 .
[5] M. Goodale,et al. Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition , 1999, Current Biology.
[6] H H Bülthoff,et al. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] S. Edelman,et al. Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics and a computational model , 1998, Vision Research.
[8] H. Bülthoff,et al. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[9] J. Martinovic,et al. An Advantage for Active versus Passive Aperture-Viewing in Visual Object Recognition , 2011, Perception.
[10] Shimon Edelman,et al. Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .
[11] H. Bülthoff,et al. Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[12] S. Ullman. The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[13] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[14] Tübingen Kybernetik,et al. Comparing view sensitivity in shape discrimination with shape sensitivity in view discrimination , 2006 .
[15] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[16] Timothy F. Brady,et al. A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[17] Masahiro Takei,et al. Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..
[18] M. Goodale,et al. Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[19] Christian Wallraven. A computational recognition system grounded in perceptual research , 2007 .
[20] H. Bülthoff,et al. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] J. Grimes. On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .
[22] R. Shepard. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[23] T Vilis,et al. “Active” and “passive” learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[24] Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .
[25] G. Wallis. The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects , 2002 .
[26] Firat Y. Testik,et al. Breakup patterns for binary drop collisions , 2008, J. Vis..
[27] M. Goodale. Transforming vision into action , 2011, Vision Research.
[28] Akira Rinoshika,et al. Visualization of a car mirror wake , 2006, J. Vis..
[29] Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik. Using morphs of familiar objects to examine how shape discriminability influences view sensitivity , 2008 .
[30] H. Bülthoff,et al. Similarity and categorization: from vision to touch. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[31] A. Tversky. Features of Similarity , 1977 .
[32] S. Thorpe,et al. Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.
[33] L. Myers,et al. Spearman Correlation Coefficients, Differences between , 2004 .
[34] R. Shepard,et al. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.
[35] Linda B. Smith,et al. Early biases and developmental changes in self-generated object views. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[36] Nao Ninomiya,et al. The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..
[37] Shimon Edelman,et al. Renewing the respect for similarity , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[38] Q. Vuong,et al. The relative weight of shape and non-rigid motion cues in object perception: a model of the parameters underlying dynamic object discrimination. , 2012, Journal of vision.
[39] Christian Wallraven,et al. Serial exploration of faces: comparing vision and touch. , 2012, Journal of vision.