Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model.

Consonant recognition was assessed in normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners in quiet as a function of speech level using a nonsense logatome test. Average recognition scores were analyzed and compared to recognition scores of a speech recognition model. In contrast to commonly used spectral speech recognition models operating on long-term spectra, a "microscopic" model operating in the time domain was used. Variations of the model (accounting for hearing impairment) and different model parameters (reflecting cochlear compression) were tested. Using these model variations this study examined whether speech recognition performance in quiet is affected by changes in cochlear compression, namely, a linearization, which is often observed in HI listeners. Consonant recognition scores for HI listeners were poorer than for NH listeners. The model accurately predicted the speech reception thresholds of the NH and most HI listeners. A partial linearization of the cochlear compression in the auditory model, while keeping audibility constant, produced higher recognition scores and improved the prediction accuracy. However, including listener-specific information about the exact form of the cochlear compression did not improve the prediction further.

[1]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Review Article: Review of the Literature on Temporal Resolution in Listeners With Cochlear Hearing Impairment: A Critical Assessment of the Role of Suprathreshold Deficits , 2009, Trends in amplification.

[3]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss , 1989, Hearing Research.

[5]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L E Humes,et al.  Evaluating a speech-reception threshold model for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling , 2011, Hearing Research.

[11]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Nima Mesgarani,et al.  Phoneme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  T. Jürgens A microscopic model of speech recognition for listeners with normal and impaired hearing , 2010 .

[17]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Beutelmann,et al.  Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system , 2001, Hearing Research.

[22]  T. Dau,et al.  A computational model of human auditory signal processing and perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  On the Four Factors Involved in Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1999 .

[24]  T. Brand,et al.  Microscopic prediction of speech recognition for listeners with normal hearing in noise using an auditory model. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation , 2012, Hearing Research.

[29]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Odette Scharenborg,et al.  Reaching over the gap: A review of efforts to link human and automatic speech recognition research , 2007, Speech Commun..

[31]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  M. Liberman,et al.  Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.