Using conversational data to determine lexical frequency in British Sign Language: The influence of text type

This paper presents findings from an objective lexical frequency study in British Sign Language (BSL) based on 24,823 tokens collected as part of the BSL Corpus Project. The BSL study is only the fourth objective frequency study involving sign languages to be reported and is also the first study for any sign language to be based on entirely on spontaneous conversational data. When compared to previous frequency studies (both spoken and signed), some similarities can be observed although differences that may be attributed to text type are also recorded. When compared with subjective frequency ratings collected for BSL, a positive relationship is reported (similar to what has been observed for spoken languages). This is in contrast to a previous study which suggested a much weaker relationship between the two; however, this conclusion was based on a frequency count derived from narratives. These differences highlight the importance of using frequency measures derived from natural and spontaneous data, an opinion that has been emphasised in the spoken language literature.

[1]  David Quinto-Pozos,et al.  Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures , 2012, Language & communication.

[2]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  H. Savin Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[4]  M. Deuchar Sign Language Diglossia in a British Deaf Community , 2013 .

[5]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  From archive to corpus: transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora , 2008, PACLIC.

[6]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  Lexical frequency in sign languages. , 2012, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[7]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  Frequency Characteristics of American Sign Language , 2003 .

[8]  David P. Vinson,et al.  The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[9]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[10]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable , 2009, Language Variation and Change.

[12]  Aaron J. Dinkin The real effect of word frequency on phonetic variation , 2007 .

[13]  G. Leech,et al.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus , 2001 .

[14]  David McKee,et al.  The Distribution of Signs in New Zealand Sign Language , 2006 .

[15]  N. Ellis REFLECTIONS ON FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[17]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition , 2007 .

[18]  Robin L. Thompson,et al.  The Road to Language Learning Is Iconic , 2012, Psychological science.

[19]  David P Vinson,et al.  The link between form and meaning in British sign language: effects of iconicity for phonological decisions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  R. Langacker A dynamic view of usage and language acquisition , 2009 .

[21]  Dagmar Divjak,et al.  Frequency effects in language learning and processing , 2012 .

[22]  H. Diessel Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change , 2007 .

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  V. Gregg Word frequency, recognition and recall. , 1976 .

[26]  Jean-Christophe Verstraete,et al.  Review of Joan Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Amsterdam: Benjamins) , 2005 .

[27]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  British Sign Language Corpus Project: A corpus of digital video data of British Sign Language 2008-2010 (First Edition). , 2011 .

[28]  Lexical frequency as a scalar variable in explaining variation , 2010 .

[29]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[30]  Richard P. Meier,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech , 2002 .

[31]  Rachel McKee,et al.  ‘So, well, whatever’: Discourse functions of palm-up in New Zealand Sign Language , 2011 .

[32]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[33]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  Lexical frequency in British Sign Language conversations: a corpus-based approach , 2011 .

[34]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[35]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[36]  S. Johansson Some observations on word frequencies in three corpora of present-day English texts , 1985 .

[37]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Appendixes , 2001 .

[38]  Adam Schembri,et al.  Australian Sign Language: Auslan: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics , 2007 .

[39]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[40]  D. Howes On the interpretation of word frequency as a variable affecting speed of recognition. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  J. Hall,et al.  Learning as a function of word-frequency. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  Gregory R. Guy Lexical Exceptions in Variable Phonology , 2007 .

[43]  Rachel Sutton-Spence,et al.  The role of the manual alphabet and fingerspelling in British sign language , 1994 .

[44]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Lexical frequency and exemplar-based learning effects in language acquisition: evidence from sentential complements , 2010 .

[45]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  Building the British Sign Language Corpus , 2013 .

[46]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[47]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  Adam Schembri,et al.  One hand or two?: Nativisation of fingerspelling in ASL and BANZSL , 2008 .

[49]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[50]  Rachel Sutton-Spence,et al.  Variation and recent change in fingerspelling in British Sign Language , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  BSL, Auslan and NZSL : three signed languages or one? , 2003 .

[53]  J. R. Hurford The origins of grammar , 2012 .

[54]  Meghan Zvaigzne,et al.  Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[55]  Elliott Hoey Review of the book Temporality in Interaction , 2008 .

[56]  Scott K. Liddell Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language , 2003 .

[57]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  From corpus to lexical database to online dictionary: Issues in annotation of the BSL Corpus and the development of BSL SignBank , 2012, LREC 2012.

[58]  Tony McEnery,et al.  What Corpora Can Offer in Language Teaching and Learning , 2011 .

[59]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[60]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change , 2002, Language Variation and Change.

[61]  Jordan Fenlon,et al.  Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the ‘1’ hand configuration , 2013, Language & communication.

[62]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[63]  Ulrike Zeshan,et al.  Interrogative Constructions in Signed Languages: Crosslinguistic Perspectives , 2004 .

[64]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages: Frontmatter , 2002 .

[65]  Adam Schembri,et al.  Rethinking ‘Classifiers’ in Signed Languages , 2003 .

[66]  David Brien,et al.  Dictionary of British sign language/English , 1992 .

[67]  O. Crasborn,et al.  Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research: selected papers from TISLR 2000 , 2003 .