A two‐entropies analysis to identify functional positions in the transmembrane region of class A G protein‐coupled receptors

Residues in the transmembrane region of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important for ligand binding and activation, but the function of individual positions is poorly understood. Using a sequence alignment of class A GPCRs (grouped in subfamilies), we propose a so‐called “two‐entropies analysis” to determine the potential role of individual positions in the transmembrane region of class A GPCRs. In our approach, such positions appear scattered, while largely clustered according to their biological function. Our method appears superior when compared to other bioinformatics approaches, such as the evolutionary trace method, entropy–variability plot, and correlated mutation analysis, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Proteins 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Mitaku,et al.  Identification of G protein‐coupled receptor genes from the human genome sequence , 2002, FEBS letters.

[2]  A. Abell,et al.  Constitutive activation of G protein-coupled receptors as a result of selective substitution of a conserved leucine residue in transmembrane helix III. , 2000, Molecular endocrinology.

[3]  L. Beamer,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of the alpha-D-phosphohexomutase superfamily. , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Guest Editors' Introduction: On Applied Research in Machine Learning , 1998, Machine Learning.

[5]  K. Jacobson,et al.  A mutational analysis of residues essential for ligand recognition at the human P2Y1 receptor. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[6]  Doron Lancet,et al.  Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human–mouse comparisons , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  J. Drews.  Drug discovery: a historical perspective. , 2000, Science.

[8]  M. Ascoli,et al.  Effect of activating and inactivating mutations on the phosphorylation and trafficking of the human lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor. , 2000, Molecular endocrinology.

[9]  R. Sowdhamini,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of ionotropic glutamate receptor sequences and modeling the interactions of agonists with different NMDA receptor subunits , 2004, Journal of molecular modeling.

[10]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  Sequence analyses of G-protein-coupled receptors: similarities to rhodopsin. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[11]  P. Schofield,et al.  A threonine residue in the seventh transmembrane domain of the human A1 adenosine receptor mediates specific agonist binding. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  Gert Vriend,et al.  Collecting and harvesting biological data: the GPCRDB and NucleaRDB information systems , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Ulrik Gether,et al.  Structural basis for activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. , 2002, Pharmacology & toxicology.

[14]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  PRINTS and PRINTS-S shed light on protein ancestry , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Yuh-Jyh Hu,et al.  Prediction of orthologous relationship by functionally important sites , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[16]  A. Hopkins,et al.  The druggable genome , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  F. Fanelli,et al.  Gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty due to luteinizing hormone receptor mutations in Brazilian boys: a novel constitutively activating mutation in the first transmembrane helix. , 2000, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[18]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Amino acids determining enzyme-substrate specificity in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein kinases , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Wess,et al.  Use of a Disulfide Cross-linking Strategy to Study Muscarinic Receptor Structure and Mechanisms of Activation* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  T. Imai,et al.  Statistical sequence analyses of G‐protein‐coupled receptors: Structural and functional characteristics viewed with periodicities of entropy, hydrophobicity, and volume , 2004, Proteins.

[21]  G Vriend,et al.  Identification of class-determining residues in G protein-coupled receptors by sequence analysis. , 1997, Receptors & channels.

[22]  J. Wess,et al.  Site-directed Mutagenesis Identifies Residues Involved in Ligand Recognition in the Human A2a Adenosine Receptor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  The PRINTS Database: A Resource for Identification of Protein Families , 2002, Briefings Bioinform..

[24]  T. Gudermann,et al.  The structural basis of G-protein-coupled receptor function and dysfunction in human diseases. , 2002, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[25]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  T. Blundell,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-beta and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[27]  A. Tucker,et al.  A1 adenosine receptors. Two amino acids are responsible for species differences in ligand recognition. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[29]  Shunyi Zhu,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of scorpion toxins specific for K‐channels , 2003, Proteins.

[30]  P. Pauwels,et al.  Analysis of ligand activation of α2-adrenoceptor subtypes under conditions of equal Gα protein stoichiometry , 2001, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[31]  Lei Shi,et al.  The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop. , 2002, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[32]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The Forgotten Serine , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Three-dimensional representations of G protein-coupled receptor structures and mechanisms. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[34]  Gert Vriend,et al.  GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[36]  Kurt Kristiansen,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function. , 2004, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[37]  L. Beamer,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of the α‐D‐phosphohexomutase superfamily , 2004 .

[38]  Laerte Oliveira,et al.  Sequence analysis reveals how G protein–coupled receptors transduce the signal to the G protein , 2003, Proteins.

[39]  L Pritchard,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of the Kunitz/BPTI family of proteins: functional divergence may have been based on conformational adjustment. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[42]  Manfred Burghammer,et al.  Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  J. Martens,et al.  A limited repertoire of mutations of the luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor gene in familial and sporadic patients with male LH-independent precocious puberty. , 1999, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[44]  J. Wess,et al.  Hydrophilic side chains in the third and seventh transmembrane helical domains of human A2A adenosine receptors are required for ligand recognition. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.

[45]  P. Schofield,et al.  Thermodynamics of full agonist, partial agonist, and antagonist binding to wild-type and mutant adenosine A1 receptors. , 1998, Biochemical pharmacology.

[46]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[47]  Jie Chen,et al.  An Evolutionary Trace Method for Functional Prediction of Genomes. , 1999, Sheng wu hua xue yu sheng wu wu li xue bao Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[48]  E. Hulme,et al.  The role of the aspartate-arginine-tyrosine triad in the m1 muscarinic receptor: mutations of aspartate 122 and tyrosine 124 decrease receptor expression but do not abolish signaling. , 1997, Molecular pharmacology.

[49]  G Vriend,et al.  Correlated Mutation Analyses on Very Large Sequence Families , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[50]  O. Vakkuri,et al.  Important amino acids for the function of the human MT1 melatonin receptor. , 2003, Biochemical pharmacology.

[51]  L. Mirny,et al.  Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity determining residues , 2002, Genome Biology.

[52]  Gerhard Hessler,et al.  Drug Design Strategies for Targeting G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptors , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[53]  U. Gether.  Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[54]  Laerte Oliveira,et al.  Identification of functionally conserved residues with the use of entropy–variability plots , 2003, Proteins.

[55]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Evolutionary Trace of G Protein-coupled Receptors Reveals Clusters of Residues That Determine Global and Class-specific Functions* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  E C Hulme,et al.  The Functional Topography of Transmembrane Domain 3 of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor, Revealed by Scanning Mutagenesis* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Structural mimicry in G protein-coupled receptors: implications of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin for structure-function analysis of rhodopsin-like receptors. , 2001, Molecular pharmacology.

[58]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[59]  B Rost,et al.  Bridging the protein sequence-structure gap by structure predictions. , 1996, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[60]  B. Roth,et al.  A highly conserved aspartic acid (Asp-155) anchors the terminal amine moiety of tryptamines and is involved in membrane targeting of the 5-HT(2A) serotonin receptor but does not participate in activation via a "salt-bridge disruption" mechanism. , 2000, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[61]  John Hwa,et al.  The Unique Ligand-binding Pocket for the Human Prostacyclin Receptor , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.