Is there warming in the pipeline? A multi-model analysis of the Zero Emissions Commitment from CO2

Abstract. The Zero Emissions Commitment (ZEC) is the change in global mean temperature expected to occur following the cessation of net CO2 emissions and as such is a critical parameter for calculating the remaining carbon budget. The Zero Emissions Commitment Model Intercomparison Project (ZECMIP) was established to gain a better understanding of the potential magnitude and sign of ZEC, in addition to the processes that underlie this metric. A total of 18 Earth system models of both full and intermediate complexity participated in ZECMIP. All models conducted an experiment where atmospheric CO2 concentration increases exponentially until 1000 PgC has been emitted. Thereafter emissions are set to zero and models are configured to allow free evolution of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Many models conducted additional second-priority simulations with different cumulative emission totals and an alternative idealized emissions pathway with a gradual transition to zero emissions. The inter-model range of ZEC 50 years after emissions cease for the 1000 PgC experiment is −0.36 to 0.29 ∘C, with a model ensemble mean of −0.07 ∘C, median of −0.05 ∘C, and standard deviation of 0.19 ∘C. Models exhibit a wide variety of behaviours after emissions cease, with some models continuing to warm for decades to millennia and others cooling substantially. Analysis shows that both the carbon uptake by the ocean and the terrestrial biosphere are important for counteracting the warming effect from the reduction in ocean heat uptake in the decades after emissions cease. This warming effect is difficult to constrain due to high uncertainty in the efficacy of ocean heat uptake. Overall, the most likely value of ZEC on multi-decadal timescales is close to zero, consistent with previous model experiments and simple theory.

[1]  C. Delire,et al.  The Global Land Carbon Cycle Simulated With ISBA‐CTRIP: Improvements Over the Last Decade , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[2]  T. Ziehn,et al.  The Australian Earth System Model: ACCESS-ESM1.5 , 2020 .

[3]  A. Ito,et al.  Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[4]  W. G. Strand,et al.  The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[5]  T. Frölicher,et al.  Increase in ocean acidity variability and extremes under increasing atmospheric CO2 , 2020, Biogeosciences.

[6]  C. Heinze,et al.  Ocean biogeochemistry in the Norwegian Earth System Model version 2 (NorESM2) , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[7]  A. Eliseev,et al.  Model Estimates of Global and Regional Climate Changes in the Holocene , 2020, Doklady Earth Sciences.

[8]  H. Matthews,et al.  Evaluation of the University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model version 2.10 (UVic ESCM 2.10) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[9]  Giang T. Tran,et al.  PALEO-PGEM v1.0: a statistical emulator of Pliocene–Pleistocene climate , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[10]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[11]  A. J. Hewitt,et al.  UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[12]  Nathan Collier,et al.  The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[13]  R. Waldman,et al.  Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[14]  A. Ito,et al.  Description of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and evaluation of its climate–biogeochemical processes and feedbacks , 2019 .

[15]  N. Gillett,et al.  The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[16]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets , 2019, Nature.

[17]  J. Rogelj,et al.  The Zero Emissions Commitment Model Intercomparison Project (ZECMIP) contribution to C4MIP: quantifying committed climate changes following zero carbon emissions , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[18]  M. Meinshausen,et al.  A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal , 2019, Nature.

[19]  S. Davis,et al.  Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target , 2019, Nature.

[20]  Bertrand Decharme,et al.  Recent Changes in the ISBA‐CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM‐CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off‐Line Hydrological Applications , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[21]  F. Joos,et al.  Low terrestrial carbon storage at the Last Glacial Maximum: constraints from multi-proxy data , 2019, Climate of the Past.

[22]  Alexander J. Winkler,et al.  Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2 , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[23]  A. MacDougall.  Limitations of the 1 % experiment as the benchmark idealized experiment for carbon cycle intercomparison in C4MIP , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[24]  P. Forster,et al.  Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming , 2019, Nature Communications.

[25]  J. Gregory,et al.  Global reconstruction of historical ocean heat storage and transport , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  H. Pollitt,et al.  Climate–carbon cycle uncertainties and the Paris Agreement , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[27]  F. Joos,et al.  A Bayesian ensemble data assimilation to constrain model parameters and land-use carbon emissions , 2018 .

[28]  Xiang Gao,et al.  Description and Evaluation of the MIT Earth System Model (MESM) , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[29]  T. Frölicher,et al.  Drivers of Continued Surface Warming After Cessation of Carbon Emissions , 2017 .

[30]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity , 2017 .

[31]  A. MacDougall.  The oceanic origin of path-independent carbon budgets , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[32]  R. Pincus,et al.  Committed warming inferred from observations , 2017 .

[33]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Carbon-nitrogen interactions in idealized simulations with JSBACH (version 3.10) , 2017 .

[34]  K. Zickfeld,et al.  What determines the warming commitment after cessation of CO2 emissions? , 2017 .

[35]  G. Myhre,et al.  Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing , 2016 .

[36]  J. Gregory,et al.  Multiannual Ocean–Atmosphere Adjustments to Radiative Forcing , 2016 .

[37]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C , 2016, Nature.

[38]  Oliver Geden,et al.  An actionable climate target , 2016 .

[39]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[40]  R. Knutti,et al.  Projecting the release of carbon from permafrost soils using a perturbed physics ensemble , 2015 .

[41]  T. Andrews,et al.  The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO2 , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection , 2015 .

[43]  T. Ziehn,et al.  The carbon cycle in the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS-ESM1) – Part 1: Model description and pre-industrial simulation , 2015 .

[44]  T. Frölicher,et al.  Extending the relationship between global warming and cumulative carbon emissions to multi-millennial timescales , 2015 .

[45]  M. Webb,et al.  The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models , 2015 .

[46]  John P. Krasting,et al.  Dominance of the Southern Ocean in Anthropogenic Carbon and Heat Uptake in CMIP5 Models , 2015 .

[47]  D. M. Lawrence,et al.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , 2014, Nature.

[48]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  A growing commitment to future CO2 emissions , 2014 .

[49]  F. Joos,et al.  Burial-nutrient feedbacks amplify the sensitivity of atmospheric carbon dioxide to changes in organic matter remineralisation , 2014 .

[50]  Igor I. Mokhov,et al.  An ensemble approach to simulate CO 2 emissions from natural fires , 2014 .

[51]  Thomas L. Frölicher,et al.  Continued global warming after CO 2 emissions stoppage , 2014 .

[52]  D. Battisti,et al.  The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake , 2014 .

[53]  C. Goldblatt,et al.  Radiative forcing at high concentrations of well‐mixed greenhouse gases , 2014 .

[54]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  Commitment accounting of CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[55]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies , 2013 .

[56]  D. Revel.  Possible elements of a 2015 legal agreement on climate change , 2013 .

[57]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Long-Term climate change commitment and reversibility: An EMIC intercomparison , 2013 .

[58]  Hongmei Li,et al.  Global ocean biogeochemistry model HAMOCC: Model architecture and performance as component of the MPI‐Earth system model in different CMIP5 experimental realizations , 2013 .

[59]  S. Solomon,et al.  Irreversible Does Not Mean Unavoidable , 2013, Science.

[60]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Influence of Ocean and Atmosphere Components on Simulated Climate Sensitivities , 2013 .

[61]  K.,et al.  Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2012 .

[62]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics:a multi-model analysis , 2012 .

[63]  A. Eliseev,et al.  Modeling of global climate variations in the 20th–23rd centuries with new RCP scenarios of anthropogenic forcing , 2012, Doklady Earth Sciences.

[64]  H. Matthews,et al.  Climate response to zeroed emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols , 2012 .

[65]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[66]  Ronald,et al.  GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics , 2012 .

[67]  G. Vallis,et al.  The passive and active nature of ocean heat uptake in idealized climate change experiments , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[68]  A. Abe‐Ouchi,et al.  Role of the ocean in controlling atmospheric CO2 concentration in the course of global glaciations , 2011 .

[69]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[70]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes , 2011 .

[71]  A. Eliseev,et al.  Uncertainty of climate response to natural and anthropogenic forcings due to different land use scenarios , 2011 .

[72]  A. Eliseev.  Estimation of changes in characteristics of the climate and carbon cycle in the 21st century accounting for the uncertainty of terrestrial biota parameter values , 2011 .

[73]  S. Marshall,et al.  Ongoing climate change following a complete cessation of carbon dioxide emissions , 2011 .

[74]  F. Joos,et al.  A Coupled Dynamical Ocean–Energy Balance Atmosphere Model for Paleoclimate Studies , 2011 .

[75]  Benoît Tartinville,et al.  Description of the Earth system model of intermediate complexity LOVECLIM version 1.2 , 2010 .

[76]  H. Matthews,et al.  Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[77]  James D. Annan,et al.  Development of a system emulating the global carbon cycle in Earth system models , 2010 .

[78]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[79]  Isaac M. Held,et al.  Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change , 2010 .

[80]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  Committed climate warming , 2010 .

[81]  F. Joos,et al.  Reversible and irreversible impacts of greenhouse gas emissions in multi-century projections with the NCAR global coupled carbon cycle-climate model , 2010 .

[82]  Alvaro Montenegro,et al.  Lifetime of Anthropogenic Climate Change: Millennial Time Scales of Potential CO2 and Surface Temperature Perturbations , 2009 .

[83]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Atmospheric lifetime of fossil-fuel carbon dioxide , 2009 .

[84]  F. Joos,et al.  The role of ocean transport in the uptake of anthropogenic CO2 , 2009 .

[85]  S. Solomon,et al.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  S. Olsen,et al.  Presentation, calibration and validation of the low-order, DCESS Earth System Model (Version 1) , 2008 .

[87]  Julia C. Hargreaves,et al.  Long-term climate commitments projected with climate-carbon cycle models , 2008 .

[88]  David Archer,et al.  The millennial atmospheric lifetime of anthropogenic CO2 , 2008 .

[89]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Stabilizing climate requires near‐zero emissions , 2008 .

[90]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Meridional reorganizations of marine and terrestrial productivity during Heinrich events , 2007 .

[91]  M. Follows,et al.  Ocean‐atmosphere partitioning of anthropogenic carbon dioxide on centennial timescales , 2007 .

[92]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[93]  Jorge L. Sarmiento,et al.  Ocean Biogeochemical Dynamics , 2006 .

[94]  Bill Hare,et al.  How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided? , 2006 .

[95]  J. Gregory,et al.  Mechanisms of ocean heat uptake in a coupled climate model and the implications for tracer based predictions of ocean heat uptake , 2006 .

[96]  T. Wigley.  The Climate Change Commitment , 2005, Science.

[97]  W. G. Strand,et al.  How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise? , 2005, Science.

[98]  Nicolas Gruber,et al.  The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO2 , 2004, Science.

[99]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[100]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Carbon cycle, vegetation, and climate dynamics in the Holocene: Experiments with the CLIMBER‐2 model , 2002 .

[101]  Marika M. Holland,et al.  The UVic earth system climate model: Model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates , 2001, Data, Models and Analysis.

[102]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  CLIMBER-2: a climate system model of intermediate complexity. Part II: model sensitivity , 2001 .

[103]  G. Myhre,et al.  New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases , 1998 .

[104]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean / atmosphere / land analyses , 1994 .

[105]  Fortunat Joos,et al.  Use of a simple model for studying oceanic tracer distributions and the global carbon cycle , 1992 .

[106]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  A perturbation simulation of CO2 uptake in an ocean general circulation model , 1992 .

[107]  D. Jenkinson,et al.  Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming , 1991, Nature.

[108]  K. Hasselmann,et al.  Transport and storage of CO2 in the ocean ——an inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model , 1987 .

[109]  T. Wigley,et al.  Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature , 1985, Nature.

[110]  W. R. Schmus.  Annual review of earth and planetary sciences , 1975 .

[111]  M. V. Vilariño,et al.  Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development , 2018 .

[112]  Shaffer,et al.  Geoscientific Model Development Presentation , calibration and validation of the low-order , DCESS Earth System Model ( Version 1 ) , 2018 .

[113]  Philip Goodwin,et al.  Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake , 2015 .

[114]  Krista,et al.  GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part II: Carbon System Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics* , 2013 .

[115]  Serge Planton,et al.  Annex III: glossary , 2013 .

[116]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[117]  A. Mouchet.  A 3D model of ocean biogeochemical cycles and climate sensitivity studies , 2011 .

[118]  N. Bates.  Climate change and ocean acidification , 2011 .

[119]  S. Liddicoat,et al.  How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming ? , 2009 .