Rapid-gradient HPLC method for measuring drug interactions with immobilized artificial membrane: comparison with other lipophilicity measures.

A fast-gradient high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method has been suggested to characterize the interactions of drugs with an immobilized artificial membrane (IAM). With a set of standards, the gradient retention times can be converted to Chromatographic Hydrophobicity Index values referring to IAM chromatography (CHI(IAM)) that approximates an acetonitrile concentration with which the equal distribution of compound can be achieved between the mobile phase and IAM. The CHI(IAM) values are more suitable for interlaboratory comparison and for high throughput screening of new molecular entities than the log k(IAM) values (isocratic retention factor on IAM). The fast-gradient method has been validated against the isocratic log k(IAM) values using the linear free energy relationship solvation equations based on the data from 48 compounds. The compound set was selected to provide a wide range and the least cross-correlation between the molecular descriptors in the solvation equation: (2) where SP is a solute property (e.g., logarithm of partition coefficients, reversed-phase (RP)-HPLC retention parameters, such as log k, log k(w), etc.) and the explanatory variables are solute descriptors as follows: R(2) is an excess molar refraction that can be obtained from the measured refractive index of a compound, pi(2)(H) is the solute dipolarity/polarizability, summation operatoralpha(2)(H) and summation operatorbeta(2)(0) are the solute overall or effective hydrogen-bond acidity and basicity, respectively, and V(x) is the McGowan characteristic volume (in cm(3)/100 mol) that can be calculated for any solute simply from molecular structure using a table of atomic constants. It was found that the relative constants of the solvation equation were very similar for the CHI(IAM) and for the log k(IAM). The IAM lipophilicity scale was quite similar to the octanol/water lipophilicity scale for neutral compounds. The effect of charge on the interaction with IAM was studied by varying the mobile phase pH.

[1]  C. Marcus,et al.  Immobilized Artificial Membrane Chromatography: Surface Chemistry and Applications , 1991 .

[2]  G. Caldwell,et al.  Evaluation of the immobilized artificial membrane phosphatidylcholine. Drug discovery column for high-performance liquid chromatographic screening of drug-membrane interactions. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  M. Abraham,et al.  Relationships between the chromatographic hydrophobicity indices and solute descriptors obtained by using several reversed-phase, diol, nitrile, cyclodextrin and immobilised artificial membrane-bonded high-performance liquid chromatography columns , 1998 .

[4]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Hydrogen bonding: XXXV. Relationship between high-performance liquid chromatography capacity factors and water-octanol partition coefficients , 1994 .

[5]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  IAM chromatography: an in vitro screen for predicting drug membrane permeability. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized Artificial Membrane Chromatography , 1991 .

[7]  Harpreet S. Chadha,et al.  Determination of solute lipophilicity, as log P(octanol) and log P(alkane) using poly(styrene–divinylbenzene) and immobilised artificial membrane stationary phases in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography , 1997 .

[8]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Physicochemical analysis of the factors governing distribution of solutes between blood and brain , 1994 .

[9]  J. Taskinen,et al.  Relationship between immobilised artificial membrane chromatographic retention and the brain penetration of structurally diverse drugs. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[10]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Phospholipid immobilization on solid surfaces. , 1994, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  R. Austin,et al.  Partitioning of ionizing molecules between aqueous buffers and phospholipid vesicles. , 1995, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  M. Abraham,et al.  HYDROGEN BONDING. 42. CHARACTERIZATION OF REVERSED‐PHASE HIGH‐PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHIC C18 STATIONARY PHASES , 1997 .

[13]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes , 2010 .

[14]  R. Kaliszan,et al.  Chromatographic hydrophobicity parameter determined on an immobilized artificial membrane column: relationships to standard measures of hydrophobicity and bioactivity , 1994 .

[15]  I. Wainer,et al.  Deactivated hydrocarbonaceous silica and immobilized artificial membrane stationary phases in high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of hydrophobicities of organic bases: relationship to log P and CLOGP. , 1993, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[16]  M. Abraham,et al.  Rapid Gradient RP-HPLC Method for Lipophilicity Determination: A Solvation Equation Based Comparison with Isocratic Methods , 1998 .

[17]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Membrane partition coefficients chromatographically measured using immobilized artificial membrane surfaces. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  C. Jefcoate,et al.  Immobilized artificial membrane chromatography: rapid purification of functional membrane proteins. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.

[19]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Chromatographic surfaces prepared from lyso phosphatidylcholine ligands , 1994 .

[20]  A. Davis,et al.  Drug-phospholipid interactions. 2. Predicting the sites of drug distribution using n-octanol/water and membrane/water distribution coefficients. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[21]  Harpreet S. Chadha,et al.  Molecular Factors Influencing Drug Transfer across the Blood‐Brain Barrier , 1997, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[22]  C. Bevan,et al.  Chromatographic Hydrophobicity Index by Fast-Gradient RP-HPLC:  A High-Throughput Alternative to log P/log D. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  M. Abraham,et al.  Algorithms for Skin Permeability Using Hydrogen Bond Descriptors: the Problem of Steroids * , 1997, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[24]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized Artificial Membrane Chromatography Prediction of Drug Transport across Biological Barriers , 1993 .

[25]  O. H. Chan,et al.  Use of immobilized artificial membrane chromatography for drug transport applications. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[26]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized artificial membrane chromatography: supports composed of membrane lipids. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[27]  M. Abraham,et al.  Hydrogen bonding. 38. Effect of solute structure and mobile phase composition on reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic capacity factors , 1994 .

[28]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized-artificial-membrane chromatography: measurements of membrane partition coefficient and predicting drug membrane permeability. , 1996, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  F. Quaglia,et al.  Chromatographic indices determined on an immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) column as descriptors of lipophilic and polar interactions of 4-phenyldihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers with biomembranes† , 1996 .

[30]  C. Pidgeon,et al.  Immobilized Artificial Membranes — screens for drug membrane interactions , 1997 .

[31]  K Gubernator,et al.  Physicochemical high throughput screening: parallel artificial membrane permeation assay in the description of passive absorption processes. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.