A Minimally Invasive Technique for Decompression of the Lumbar Spine

Study Design. The technical feasibility of percutaneous microendoscopic bilateral decompression of lumbar stenosis via a unilateral approach was evaluated in a human cadaver model. Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using a microendoscopic laminotomy technique to treat spinal stenosis. Summary and Background Data. Minimally invasive surgery is an important means of reducing tissue trauma and patient morbidity. This may prove to be essential in improving pain and in reducing postoperative stress responses and delayed sequelae that can lead to unfortunate complications after otherwise uneventful procedures. To date, minimally invasive lumbar endoscopic techniques have not been used to decompress the lumbar spinal canal. Methods. In each of four cadavers, the laminae of L1 through L4 were subjected to one of four procedures consisting of unilateral microendoscopic laminotomy, bilateral microendoscopic laminotomy, unilateral open laminotomy, and bilateral open laminotomy. Every procedure was performed once at all levels. Computed tomography was performed before and after laminotomy to establish the extent of decompression of the spinal canal, and measurements of the midsagittal, interpedicular, and decompression diameters were taken. Results. The four procedures were successfully performed at every level. Satisfactory decompression of the spinal canal was achieved regardless of the approach used. The exiting nerve roots were well visualized when any one of these techniques was used. Complications, including dural tears and facet complex instability, were independent of the procedure performed. Conclusion. Microendoscopic laminotomy can be used to decompress the spinal canal as effectively as an open laminotomy and may prove to be beneficial in decreasing the complications and morbidity of standard treatments for lumbar stenosis.

[1]  P. Guigui,et al.  Radiologic and computed tomography image evaluation of bone regrowth after wide surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[2]  J. Partanen,et al.  Local Denervation Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Postoperative Failed Back Syndrome , 1993, Spine.

[3]  H. Kehlet Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. , 1997 .

[4]  R. Bray,et al.  Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[5]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy with a new dorsolateral decompressive procedure. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Lin Internal decompression for multiple levels of lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note. , 1982, Neurosurgery.

[7]  S. O’laoire,et al.  Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. , 1988, Neurosurgery.

[8]  F. Postacchini Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1987, Spine.

[9]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Outcome Results and a 3-Year Survivorship Analysis , 2000, Spine.

[10]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[11]  R. Deyo,et al.  Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Attempted Meta‐Analysis of the Literature , 1992, Spine.

[12]  T. Mayer,et al.  Comparison of CT Scan Muscle Measurements and Isokinetic Trunk Strength in Postoperative Patients , 1989, Spine.

[13]  P. Wood,et al.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in old people. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  M. Schork,et al.  Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Radiographic changes and clinical correlations. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  L. Herron,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[16]  R A Deyo,et al.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. , 2000, Spine.

[17]  M. Schork,et al.  Outcome after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical correlations. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[18]  G. Kraft,et al.  Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[20]  M. Ebersold The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice , 1993 .

[21]  T. Ducker,et al.  Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. , 1990, Neurosurgery.

[22]  See Dh,et al.  Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression. , 1975 .

[23]  E. Berg,et al.  Patient outcomes after minimally destabilizing lumbar stenosis decompression: the "Port-Hole" technique. , 2000, Spine.