Three-dimensional modeling of biofouling and fluid dynamics in feed spacer channels of membrane devices

Abstract This study presents a new three-dimensional (3-d) computational model that couples fluid dynamics, solutes transport and biofouling by biofilm formation in NF and RO membrane modules. A computational domain of 3 × 5 feed spacer frames with geometry as applied in practice was used in the model. Comparing the hydrodynamics computed with the realistic spacer geometry and with a spacer made from straight cylindrical filaments, like in previous modeling studies, showed that cylindrical filament feed spacers are too simplified for representative modeling studies. The 3-d numerical simulations showed that biomass accumulation, by attachment and biofilm growth in time, strongly affected the feed channel pressure drop, liquid velocity distribution and residence time distribution. The main pressure drop is encountered by the flow passing over the spacer filaments. Simulations showed the development of a heterogeneous flow pattern and formation of preferential flow channels. This study indicates that the real impact of biofouling is on the flow regime leading to quasi-stagnant zones and an increase in the dispersion of the residence time distribution. The presented 3-d mathematical modeling approach in (bio)fouling of membrane modules may have significant implications for membrane system design and operation to have stable membrane installation performance at minimal costs.

[1]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Adhesion and biofilm development on suspended carriers in airlift reactors: hydrodynamic conditions versus surface characteristics. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  Abdul Latif Ahmad,et al.  Impact of different spacer filament geometries on concentration polarization control in narrow membrane channel , 2005 .

[3]  Kuo-Lun Tung,et al.  Mitigating the curvature effect of the spacer-filled channel in a spiral-wound membrane module , 2009 .

[4]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Numerical study of mass transfer in three-dimensional spacer-filled narrow channels with steady flow , 2007 .

[5]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  A critical flux to avoid biofouling of spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Fact or fiction? , 2009 .

[6]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  Discrete-differential modelling of biofilm structure , 1999 .

[7]  Y. Watanabe,et al.  An experimental study on aerobic denitrification with polyvinyl alcohol as a carbon source in biofilms , 1995 .

[8]  Kuo-Lun Tung,et al.  The effect of curvature of a spacer-filled channel on fluid flow in spiral-wound membrane modules , 2008 .

[9]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[10]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  CFD simulations of net-type turbulence promoters in a narrow channel , 2001 .

[11]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The Membrane Fouling Simulator: A practical tool for fouling prediction and control , 2006 .

[12]  H. Flemming,et al.  The permeability of biofouling layers on membranes , 1994 .

[13]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction , 2009, Biofouling.

[14]  Ken Darcovich,et al.  Turbulent transport in membrane modules by CFD simulation in two dimensions , 1995 .

[15]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  The effect of the ladder-type spacers configuration in NF spiral-wound modules on the concentration boundary layers disruption☆ , 2002 .

[16]  William B. Suratt,et al.  Biofouling of PVD-1 reverse osmosis elements in the water treatment plant of the City of Dunedin, Florida , 1995 .

[17]  M. Shakaib,et al.  Study on the effects of spacer geometry in membrane feed channels using three-dimensional computational flow modeling , 2007 .

[18]  M. Shakaib,et al.  CFD modeling for flow and mass transfer in spacer-obstructed membrane feed channels , 2009 .

[19]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Investigation of flow next to membrane walls , 2005 .

[20]  A. B. de Haan,et al.  Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules , 2002 .

[21]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy studies of membrane biofouling , 2008 .

[22]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Fluid dynamics of spacer filled rectangular and curvilinear channels , 2006 .

[23]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Effect of diffusive and convective substrate transport on biofilm structure formation: a two-dimensional modeling study. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Flow visualization through spacer filled channels by computational fluid dynamics-II: improved feed spacer designs☆ , 2005 .

[25]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Numerical study of two-dimensional multi-layer spacer designs for minimum drag and maximum mass transfer , 2008 .

[26]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Spiral wound modules and spacers - Review and analysis , 2004 .

[27]  Alkiviades C. Payatakes,et al.  Hierarchical simulator of biofilm growth and dynamics in granular porous materials , 2007 .

[28]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[29]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Simulation of the Flow around Spacer Filaments between Narrow Channel Walls. 1. Hydrodynamics , 2002 .

[30]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Constrained discounted Markov decision processes and Hamiltonian cycles , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[31]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Comparison of flow structures in spacer-filled flat and annular channels⁎ , 2006 .

[32]  Mark C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  A framework for multidimensional modelling of activity and structure of multispecies biofilms. , 2005, Environmental microbiology.

[33]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  A numerical and experimental study of mass transfer in spacer-filled channels: Effects of spacer geometrical characteristics and Schmidt number , 2009 .

[34]  J.L.C. Santos,et al.  Investigation of flow patterns and mass transfer in membrane module channels filled with flow-aligned spacers using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) , 2007 .

[35]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Quantitative biofouling diagnosis in full scale nanofiltration and reverse osmosis installations. , 2008, Water research.

[36]  Antonio Dr Chiolle,et al.  Mathematical model of reverse osmosis in parallel-wall channels with turbulence promoting nets , 1978 .

[37]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Sensitive pressure drop measurements of individual lead membrane elements for accurate early biofouling detection , 2009 .

[38]  Albert S Kim,et al.  EPS biofouling in membrane filtration: an analytic modeling study. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[39]  Danial Taherzadeh,et al.  Computational study of the drag and oscillatory movement of biofilm streamers in fast flows , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[40]  J. Hofman,et al.  Biofouling of membranes for drinking water production , 1998 .

[41]  Mark C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  A more unifying hypothesis for biofilm structures , 1997 .

[42]  Abdul Latif Ahmad,et al.  Impact of different spacer filaments geometries on 2D unsteady hydrodynamics and concentration polarization in spiral wound membrane channel , 2006 .

[43]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm structure with a hybrid differential-discrete cellular automaton approach. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[44]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Predicting the effect of membrane spacers on mass transfer , 2008 .

[45]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Modeling the impacts of feed spacer geometry on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration processes , 2009 .

[46]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems. , 2010, Water research.

[47]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of flow in spacer-filled channels: Effect of spacer geometrical characteristics , 2007 .

[48]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Three‐dimensional simulations of biofilm growth in porous media , 2009 .

[49]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure , 2007 .

[50]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[51]  Sandeep K. Karode,et al.  Flow visualization through spacer filled channels by computational fluid dynamics I. , 2001 .

[52]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Particle-Based Multidimensional Multispecies Biofilm Model , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[53]  C. Robertson,et al.  Hydraulic Permeability of Immobilized Bacterial Cell Aggregates , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[54]  S. G. Yiantsios,et al.  Numerical simulation of the flow in a plane-channel containing a periodic array of cylindrical turbulence promoters , 2004 .

[55]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical study on the correlation of spatial structure, hydrodynamic conditions, and mass transfer and conversion in biofilms , 2000 .

[56]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules , 2002 .

[57]  Herve Morvan,et al.  CFD simulations of flow and concentration polarization in spacer-filled channels for application to water desalination , 2008 .

[58]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: a feed spacer problem. , 2009, Water research.

[59]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Pressure, flow, and concentration profiles in open and spacer-filled membrane channels , 2006 .

[60]  Z Lewandowski,et al.  Oscillation characteristics of biofilm streamers in turbulent flowing water as related to drag and pressure drop. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[61]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  The effect of imposed flux on biofouling in reverse osmosis: Role of concentration polarisation and biofilm enhanced osmotic pressure phenomena , 2008 .