Neural correlates of listening effort related factors: Influence of age and hearing impairment

In the last years, there has been a rising interest to find an objective method to estimate listening effort. Previously, we have shown that the wavelet phase synchronization stability (WPSS), gained from the instantaneous phase of auditory late responses (ALRs), could serve as a feasible measure for listening effort related factors. In the current study, we examined if the WPSS reflects the listening effort in young as well as middle-aged subjects and in persons with a different degree of hearing loss. To evoke ALR sequences, we generated syllabic paradigms with a different level of difficulty to evoke ALR sequences. We expected, due to the varying task demand, that the subjects require a measurable difference in the amount of effort to solve the paradigms. Additionally, a possible age and/or hearing loss related effect on the neural correlates of listening effort was investigated. The results indicate, that WPSS reflects the listening effort related factors needed to solve an auditory task. A further finding was that the reaction time data and the N1 wave amplitude information hardly yield any correlate of the invested listening effort. In addition, we noticed an age as well as hearing sensitivity related effect on the listening effort.

[1]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Event-related phase reorganization may explain evoked neural dynamics , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  M. Akeroyd.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[3]  A. P Bradley,et al.  On wavelet analysis of auditory evoked potentials , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  The division of attention and the human auditory evoked potential , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Akeroyd,et al.  Two-eared listening in dynamic situations , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[7]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[8]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[9]  D. Kurtzberg,et al.  The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Effects of Age, Age-Related Hearing Loss, and Contralateral Cafeteria Noise on the Discrimination of Small Frequency Changes: Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Measures , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[11]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[12]  G. Adler,et al.  Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[13]  A. Bruns.  Fourier-, Hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches? , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Selective Attention Increases Both Gain and Feature Selectivity of the Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[15]  Matthew S. Tata,et al.  Neural correlates of auditory distraction revealed in theta-band EEG , 2012, Neuroreport.

[16]  David E. Friedman.  The Components of Aging , 2011 .

[17]  Yin Fen Low,et al.  EEG phase reset due to auditory attention: an inverse time-scale approach , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[18]  Ulrich Faigle,et al.  Sensory gating revisited: Relation between brain oscillations and auditory evoked potentials in schizophrenia , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[19]  R. Burkard.  Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[20]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[21]  James W. Hall.  Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses , 1991 .

[22]  F. I. Corona-Strauss,et al.  Extraction of Auditory Attention Correlates in Single Sweeps of Cortical Potentials by Maximum Entropy Paradigms and its Application , 2007, 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[23]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[24]  L E Humes.  Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[25]  B. Goldwater.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  P. Falkai,et al.  Objective Quantification of the Tinnitus Decompensation by Synchronization Measures of Auditory Evoked Single Sweeps , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[27]  Brent Edwards,et al.  The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[28]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Personal Hearing Aids on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[29]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[30]  Antoine J. Shahin,et al.  Attentional Gain Control of Ongoing Cortical Speech Representations in a “Cocktail Party” , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Kahneman.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[32]  Bruce A Schneider,et al.  Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[33]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[34]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[35]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  D. J. Strauss,et al.  On the objective electrophysiological estimation of listening effort in different age groups , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[37]  Carol L Mackersie,et al.  Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[38]  Daniel J. Strauss,et al.  Auditory streaming and listening effort: An event related potential study , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[39]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Selective listening of concurrent auditory stimuli: An event-related potential study , 2010, Hearing Research.

[40]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[41]  Daniel J. Strauss,et al.  Objective estimation of the listening effort: Towards a neuropsychological and neurophysical model , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[42]  K. Tremblay,et al.  Speech Evoked Potentials: From the Laboratory to the Clinic , 2008, Ear and hearing.

[43]  Diane Kurtzberg,et al.  Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[44]  K. Squires,et al.  Age-related variations in evoked potentials to auditory stimuli in normal human subjects. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  F. I. Corona-Strauss,et al.  Non-listening effort related parameters in auditory discrimination paradigms , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[46]  L Hickson,et al.  Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[47]  Daniel J. Strauss,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of listening effort: neurodynamical modeling and measurement , 2010, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[48]  W. Delb,et al.  Neural Synchronization Stability in the Tinnitus Decompensation , 2005, Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005..

[49]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  P F Seitz,et al.  Assessing the Cognitive Demands of Speech Listening for People with Hearing Losses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[51]  J M Festen,et al.  Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[52]  D. Downs.  Effects of hearing and use on speech discrimination and listening effort. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[53]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: sound intensity modulates auditory evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG. , 2007, International Journal of Psychophysiology.

[54]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[55]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  W. Reith,et al.  On the cognitive neurodynamics of listening effort: A phase clustering analysis of large-scale neural correlates , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[57]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[58]  E. Schröger,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction , 2007, Brain Research.