Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions

This paper introduces an extension of collocational analysis that takes into account grammatical structure and is specifically geared to investigating the interaction of lexemes and the grammatical constructions associated with them. The method is framed in a construction-based approach to language, i.e. it assumes that grammar consists of signs (form-meaning pairs) and is thus not fundamentally different from the lexicon. The method is applied to linguistic expressions at various levels of abstraction (words, semi-fixed phrases, argument structures, tense, aspect and mood). The method has two main applications: first, to increase the adequacy of grammatical description by providing an objective way of identifying the meaning of a grammatical construction and determining the degree to which particular slots in it prefer or are restricted to a particular set of lexemes; second, to provide data for linguistic theory-building.

[1]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[2]  Michael Oakes,et al.  Statistics for Corpus Linguistics , 1998 .

[3]  Sun-Young Oh,et al.  Actually and in fact in American English: a data-based analysis , 2000, English Language and Linguistics.

[4]  O. Jespersen.  A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .

[5]  P. Tichý.  Constructions , 1986, Philosophy of Science.

[6]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Using Statistics in Lexical Analysis , 2003, Lexical Acquisition: Exploiting On-Line Resources to Build a Lexicon.

[7]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[8]  S. Tsohatzidis.  Foundations of speech act theory : philosophical and linguistic perspectives , 1994 .

[9]  Michael Lewis.  The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward , 2002 .

[10]  Geert Jacobs.  Anna Wierzbicka. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction , 1995 .

[11]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Fishing for Exactness , 1996, ArXiv.

[12]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[13]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[14]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[15]  George Lakoff,et al.  Irregularity In Syntax , 1970 .

[16]  Marc Weeber,et al.  Extracting the lowest-frequency words: pitfalls and possibilities , 2000, CL.

[17]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[18]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[19]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Book Reviews: Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English , 2000, CL.

[20]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[21]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[22]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[23]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[24]  Toni Rietveld,et al.  Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language and Language Behaviour , 1993 .

[25]  Patrick Hanks,et al.  Contextual dependency and lexical sets , 1996 .

[26]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Syntactic Intrusions and The Notion of Grammatical Construction , 1985 .

[27]  D. Noël.  Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. By SUSAN HUNSTON and GILL FRANCIS (Studies in corpus linguistics 4.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000 , 2002 .

[28]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[29]  Michael Barlow,et al.  A Schema-Based Approach to Grammatical Description , 1994 .

[30]  Anatol Stefanowitsch,et al.  Constructing causation: A construction grammar approach to analytic causatives , 2001 .

[31]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar” , 1988 .

[32]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[33]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  COLLOCATIONS AND SEMANTIC PROFILES: ON THE CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE WITH QUANTITATIVE STUDIES , 1995 .

[34]  T. Givon.  Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics , 1989 .

[35]  Jane Willis,et al.  Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. , 2002 .

[36]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Co-occurrence Patterns among Collocations: A Tool for Corpus-Based Lexical Knowledge Acquisition , 1993, CL.

[37]  Ted Dunning,et al.  Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence , 1993, CL.

[38]  Scott Songlin Piao.  Word Alignment in English-Chinese Parallel Corpora , 2002, Lit. Linguistic Comput..