On the roles of chord-wise flexibility in a flapping wing with hovering kinematics

The aerodynamic performance of a flapping two-dimensional wing section with simplified chord-wise flexibility is studied computationally. Bending stiffness is modelled by a torsion spring connecting two or three rigid components. The leading portion of the wing is prescribed with kinematics that are characteristic of biological hovering, and the aft portion responds passively. Coupled simulations of the Navier–Stokes equations and the wing dynamics are conducted for a wide variety of spring stiffnesses and kinematic parameters. Performance is assessed by comparison of the mean lift, power consumption and lift per unit power, with those from an equivalent rigid wing, and two cases are explored in greater detail through force histories and vorticity snapshots. From the parametric survey, four notable mechanisms are identified through which flexible wings behave differently from rigid counterparts. Rigid wings consistently require more power than their flexible counterparts to generate the same kinematics, as passive deflection leads to smaller drag and torque penalties. Aerodynamic performance is degraded in very flexible wings undergoing large heaving excursions, caused by a premature detachment of the leading-edge vortex. However, a mildly flexible wing has consistently good performance over a wide range of phase differences between pitching and heaving – in contrast to the relative sensitivity of a rigid wing to this parameter – due to better accommodation of the shed leading-edge vortex into the wake during the return stroke, and less tendency to interact with previously shed trailing-edge vortices. Furthermore, a flexible wing permits lift generation even when the leading portion remains nearly vertical, as the wing passively deflects to create an effectively smaller angle of attack, similar to the passive pitching mechanism recently identified for rigid wings. It is found that an effective pitch angle can be defined that accounts for wing deflection to align the results with those of the equivalent rigid wing.

[1]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  T. Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the fling , 2007 .

[3]  R. Dudley The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution , 1999 .

[4]  B. Balachandran,et al.  Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  C. Ellington The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. III. Kinematics , 1984 .

[6]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical and experimental study of the fluid dynamics of a flapping wing with low order flexibility , 2008 .

[7]  T. Daniel,et al.  Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  C. Ellington,et al.  The three–dimensional leading–edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth , 1997 .

[9]  Z. J. Wang Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic forces on small-scale wings: experiments, simulations and models , 2008 .

[11]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Symmetry breaking leads to forward flapping flight , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Passive wing pitch reversal in insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Jonathan Edward Toomey Numerical and experimental studies of flexibility in flapping wing aerodynamics , 2009 .

[14]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  The biomechanics of insect flight. Form, function, and evolution: Robert Dudley; Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ , 2003 .

[15]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Numerical simulation of the fluid dynamics of 2D rigid body motion with the vortex particle method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[16]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[17]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[18]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Dynamically coupled fluid-body interactions in vorticity-based numerical simulations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  Beverley J. Glover,et al.  Vortex shedding model of a flapping flag , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.