Is transcutaneous peroneal stimulation beneficial to patients with chronic stroke using an ankle-foot orthosis? A within-subjects study of patients' satisfaction, walking speed and physical activity level.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether community-dwelling chronic stroke patients wearing an ankle-foot orthosis would benefit from changing to functional electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve. METHODS In 26 community-dwelling chronic (> 6 months post-onset) patients after stroke, their ankle-foot orthosis was replaced by a surface-based functional electrical stimulation device (NESS L300). Comfortable walking speed over 10 m was measured at baseline with the ankle-foot orthosis and after 2 and 8 weeks with both ankle-foot orthosis and functional electrical stimulation. The level of physical activity was assessed with a pedometer, and patients' satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at baseline and at week 8 regarding ankle-foot orthosis and functional electrical stimulation, respectively. RESULTS Ankle-foot orthosis and functional electrical stimulation were equally effective with regard to walking speed and activity level. The participants were more satisfied with functional electrical stimulation than with their ankle-foot orthosis regarding the effort and stability of walking, quality of the gait pattern, walking distance, comfort of wearing and appearance of the device. CONCLUSION The patients judged functional electrical stimulation superior to their ankle-foot orthosis, but measurements of walking speed and physical activity could not objectify the experienced benefits of functional electrical stimulation. Other outcome measures focusing on the stability and effort of ambulation may objectify the perceived benefits of functional electrical stimulation in community-dwelling chronic stroke patients.

[1]  J. Subbarao,et al.  Walking after spinal cord injury. Goal or wish? , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Barbenel,et al.  Peroneal stimulator; evaluation for the correction of spastic drop foot in hemiplegia. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Effects of a New Radio Frequency–Controlled Neuroprosthesis on Gait Symmetry and Rhythmicity in Patients with Chronic Hemiparesis , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[4]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Neuromuscular stimulation after stroke: from technology to clinical deployment , 2009, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[5]  L E Larsson.  Functional electrical stimulation. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[6]  T Sinkjaer,et al.  Inhibition of the triceps surae stretch reflex by stimulation of the deep peroneal nerve in persons with spastic stroke. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  P. Taylor,et al.  Experience of clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator. , 1997, Artificial organs.

[8]  A. Kralj,et al.  Use of functional electrical stimulation in the lower extremities of incomplete spinal cord injured patients. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[9]  V. Alfieri.  Electrical treatment of spasticity. Reflex tonic activity in hemiplegic patients and selected specific electrostimulation. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  H. Thieme,et al.  Reduced Ambulatory Activity after Stroke: The Role of Balance, Gait, and Cardiovascular Fitness , 2005 .

[12]  N. Gros,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation for the modification of spasticity in hemiplegic patients. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[13]  D. Wood,et al.  The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: Rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude , 2004, Neurology.

[15]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Thomas Sinkjaer,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the benefits and problems of using the ActiGait implanted drop-foot stimulator. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  J. Norton,et al.  Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  L. Sheffler,et al.  Peroneal Nerve Stimulation versus an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Correction of Footdrop in Stroke: Impact on Functional Ambulation , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Liberson Wt,et al.  Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  A Multicenter Trial of a Footdrop Stimulator Controlled by a Tilt Sensor , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Lisa C. Blum,et al.  Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[22]  T. Platz,et al.  Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[23]  D. Wade,et al.  Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. , 1990, International disability studies.

[24]  J. Norton,et al.  Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS) , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[25]  R Merletti,et al.  Clinical experience of electronic peroneal stimulators in 50 hemiparetic patients. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  Jane Burridge,et al.  The Effect of Common Peroneal Nerve Stimulation on Quadriceps Spasticity in Hemiplegia , 1997 .

[27]  Beverley Rader Lugo,et al.  Clinical Experience , 2009 .

[28]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: a systematic review. , 2004, Artificial organs.

[29]  R. Waters,et al.  Experimental correction of footdrop by electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  T. Bajd,et al.  The use of a four-channel electrical stimulator as an ambulatory aid for paraplegic patients. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[31]  T Bajd,et al.  Neurophysiological background of the use of functional electrical stimulation in paraplegia. , 1986, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Neuroprosthesis for footdrop compared with an ankle-foot orthosis: effects on postural control during walking. , 2009, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[33]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Effects of a Foot Drop Neuroprosthesis on Functional Abilities, Social Participation, and Gait Velocity , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.