Reconstruction of the ground-layer adaptive-optics point spread function for MUSE wide field mode observations

Here we describe a simple, efficient, and most importantly fully operational point-spread-function(PSF)-reconstruction approach for laser-assisted ground layer adaptive optics (GLAO) in the frame of the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) Wide Field Mode. Based on clear astrophysical requirements derived by the MUSE team and using the functionality of the current ESO Adaptive Optics Facility we aim to develop an operational PSF-reconstruction (PSFR) algorithm and test it both in simulations and using on-sky data. The PSFR approach is based on a Fourier description of the GLAO correction to which the specific instrumental effects of MUSE Wide Field Mode (pixel size, internal aberrations, etc.) have been added. It was first thoroughly validated with full end-to-end simulations. Sensitivity to the main atmospheric and AO system parameters was analysed and the code was re-optimised to account for the sensitivity found. Finally, the optimised algorithm was tested and commissioned using more than one year of on-sky MUSE data. We demonstrate with an on-sky data analysis that our algorithm meets all the requirements imposed by the MUSE scientists, namely an accuracy better than a few percent on the critical PSF parameters including full width at half maximum and global PSF shape through the kurtosis parameter of a Moffat function. The PSFR algorithm is publicly available and is used routinely to assess the MUSE image quality for each observation. It can be included in any post-processing activity which requires knowledge of the PSF.

[1]  C. Balkowski,et al.  Evidence for strong dynamical evolution in disc galaxies through the last 11 Gyr. GHASP VIII – a local reference sample of rotating disc galaxies for high‐redshift studies , 2009, 0904.3891.

[2]  Robin Arsenault,et al.  AOF – first on-sky performance of the GALACSI GLAO mode (or how to close 10 loops in less than 5 minutes) , 2017 .

[3]  Massimo Stiavelli,et al.  The Hubble Ultra Deep Field , 2003, astro-ph/0607632.

[4]  P L Wizinowich,et al.  PRIME: PSF Reconstruction and Identification for Multiple-source characterization Enhancement – application to Keck NIRC2 imager , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[5]  Sebastian Kamann PampelMuse: Crowded-field 3D spectroscopy , 2018 .

[6]  Raúl Infante-Sainz,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey extended point spread functions , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[7]  Martin M. Roth,et al.  Resolving stellar populations with crowded field 3D spectroscopy , 2012, 1211.0445.

[8]  G. Bruce Berriman,et al.  Astrophysics Source Code Library , 2012, ArXiv.

[9]  Gert Finger,et al.  HAWK-I: A new wide-field 1- to 2.5-μm imager for the VLT , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Jean-Pierre Véran,et al.  Simulation model based approach for long exposure atmospheric point spread function reconstruction for laser guide star multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2012, Applied optics.

[11]  R. Genzel,et al.  SINFONI adaptive optics integral field spectroscopy of the Circinus Galaxy , 2006 .

[12]  Martin M. Roth,et al.  A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE: The contribution of rotation to cluster dynamics studied with 200 000 stars , 2017, 1710.07257.

[13]  T. Fusco,et al.  Closing the gap between Earth-based and interplanetary mission observations: Vesta seen by VLT/SPHERE , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[14]  Ole Streicher,et al.  The MUSE Data Reduction Pipeline: Status after Preliminary Acceptance Europe , 2014, 1507.00034.

[15]  H. Maître,et al.  Estimation of the adaptive optics long-exposure point-spread function using control loop data , 1997 .

[16]  David Mary,et al.  The MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey: I. Survey description, data reduction and source detection , 2017, 1710.03002.

[17]  J. Cepa,et al.  The effects of seeing on Sérsic profiles – II. The Moffat PSF , 2001, astro-ph/0109067.

[18]  Roland Bacon,et al.  The second-generation VLT instrument MUSE: science drivers and instrument design , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Sylvain Oberti,et al.  Physics-based model of the adaptive-optics-corrected point spread function , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[20]  N. M. Milton,et al.  Performance Modeling of a Wide‐Field Ground‐Layer Adaptive Optics System , 2006, astro-ph/0610097.

[21]  James E. Larkin,et al.  DYNAMICS OF GALACTIC DISKS AND MERGERS AT z ∼ 1.6: SPATIALLY RESOLVED SPECTROSCOPY WITH KECK LASER GUIDE STAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS , 2008, 0810.5599.

[22]  Thierry Fusco,et al.  NAOS on-line characterization of turbulence parameters and adaptive optics performance , 2004 .

[23]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Cluster kinematics and stellar rotation in NGC 419 with MUSE and adaptive optics , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[24]  Robert K. Tyson Chapter 3 – Adaptive Optics Systems , 1991 .

[25]  Eric Gendron,et al.  New algorithms for adaptive optics point-spread function reconstruction , 2006 .

[26]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Extragalactic Fields Optimized for Adaptive Optics , 2011, 1101.0818.

[27]  H. Carfantan,et al.  GalPaK3D: A BAYESIAN PARAMETRIC TOOL FOR EXTRACTING MORPHOKINEMATICS OF GALAXIES FROM 3D DATA , 2015, 1501.06586.

[28]  J. Conan,et al.  Tomographic reconstruction for wide-field adaptive optics systems: Fourier domain analysis and fundamental limitations. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.