In UK policy circles, there is a growing recognition that mediating the interface between policy making and the public through local government led initiatives is one way through which to provide a practicable means to deliver carbon reduction at an individual, household, and community level. Following on from the aims of Local Agenda 21 in creating the space for a more bottom–up policy infrastructure, the 2007 UK Energy White Paper is one of the latest political statements to highlight the way in which reaching UK targets on CO2 emissions will continue to involve a greater local response to climate change. This emphasis was given further weight through the introduction of a new local performance framework in April 2008. This new set of 198 national performance indicators (PIs) for local government and other local bodies are now the only PIs which Central Government will use to assess local government performance. Importantly, they include three PIs that specifically cover the issue of climate change and carbon reduction (CLG 2007a). For many years, local authorities in the UK have played a role in encouraging more community led sustainable development objectives. However, what Giddens (2000) describes as the ‘modernization’ of local governance, has often proved to be inherently problematic, not least in developing the ‘civic engagement’ aspect of this model of governance. The article traces these problems in relation to the increasing responsibilities of local government in developing local community led responses to climate change. Although the UK Government continue to highlight the opportunities for this type of political framework in addressing the bottom–up complexities of climate change, we consider why some of the issues raised in three case study examples are indicative of wider problems in expanding this form of governance in the UK. The article concludes that difficulties encountered with regard to the implementation of LA 21's central objectives have extended through to the more recent focus for action in combating the specific challenge of climate change. More broadly, innovation in the sense of fostering an effective level of civic engagement in sustainable development objectives, continues to remain problematic.
[1]
Tony Byrne,et al.
Local government in Britain: Everyone's guide to how it all works
,
1900
.
[2]
R. Löfstedt,et al.
Think Globally, Act Locally? Local Climate Change and Energy Policies in Sweden and the UK
,
1997
.
[3]
B. Tuxworth.
From environment to sustainability: Surveys and analysis of local agenda 21 process development in UK local authorities
,
1996
.
[4]
Michael Peters *,et al.
SME environmental attitudes and participation in local‐scale voluntary initiatives: some practical applications
,
2004
.
[5]
K. Lucas,et al.
What's in a Name?: Local Agenda 21, Community Planning and Neighbourhood Renewal
,
2003
.
[6]
P. Fleming,et al.
Local and regional greenhouse gas management
,
2004
.
[7]
A. Dobson.
The ‘Earth Summit’ agreements: a guide and assessment
,
1994
.
[8]
H. Voisey,et al.
The political significance of local agenda 21: The early stages of some European experience
,
1996
.
[9]
G. Craig.
Community Work and the State.
,
1989
.
[10]
V. Rich.
Personal communication
,
1989,
Nature.
[11]
Stephen James Martin.
Engaging with citizens and other stakeholders
,
2009
.
[12]
Norma Carter,et al.
LOCAL AGENDA 21 IN THE UK
,
1996
.
[13]
Marilyn Taylor,et al.
Public Policy in the Community
,
2003
.
[14]
Andrew Jordan.
The environmental case for Europe: Britain's European environmental policy
,
2006
.
[15]
A. Irwin.
Sociology and the Environment
,
2001
.
[16]
A. Giddens.
The Third Way and Its Critics
,
2000
.
[17]
J. Barry,et al.
Environment and Social Theory
,
1999
.
[18]
Steve Martin,et al.
Joined up policy in practice? The coherence and impacts of the local government modernisation agenda
,
2006
.
[19]
Andrew Jordan,et al.
Managing Sustainable Development
,
1994
.
[20]
Matthew Leach,et al.
Local policies for DSM: the UK's home energy conservation act
,
2000
.