Role of Model‐Informed Drug Development in Pediatric Drug Development, Regulatory Evaluation, and Labeling

The unique challenges in pediatric drug development require efficient and innovative tools. Model‐informed drug development (MIDD) offers many powerful tools that have been frequently applied in pediatric drug development. MIDD refers to the application of quantitative models to integrate and leverage existing knowledge to bridge knowledge gaps and facilitate development and decision‐making processes. This article discusses the current practices and visions of applying MIDD in pediatric drug development, regulatory evaluation, and labeling, with detailed examples. The application of MIDD in pediatric drug development can be broadly classified into 3 categories: leveraging knowledge for bridging the gap, dose selection and optimization, and informing clinical trial design. In particular, MIDD can provide evidence for the assumption of exposure‐response similarity in bridging existing knowledge from reference to target population, support the dose selection and optimization based on the “exposure‐matching” principle in the pediatric population, and increase the efficiency and success rate of pediatric trials. In addition, the role of physiologically based pharmacokinetics in drug‐drug interaction in children and adolescents and in utilizing ontogeny data to predict pharmacokinetics in neonates and infants has also been illustrated. Moving forward, MIDD should be incorporated into all pediatric drug development programs at every stage to inform clinical trial design and dose selection, with both its strengths and limitations clearly laid out. The accumulated experience and knowledge of MIDD has and will continue to drive regulatory policy development and refinement, which will ultimately improve the consistency and efficiency of pediatric drug development.

[1]  P. Keegan,et al.  Model-informed drug development approach supporting approval of the 4-week (Q4W) dosing schedule for nivolumab (Opdivo) across multiple indications: a regulatory perspective. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Model‐Informed Drug Development: Current US Regulatory Practice and Future Considerations , 2019, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  J. Gao,et al.  Bioequivalence Comparison of Pediatric Dasatinib Formulations and Elucidation of Absorption Mechanisms Through Integrated PBPK Modeling. , 2019, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  Shiew-Mei Huang,et al.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Regulatory Science: An Update From the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Office of Clinical Pharmacology. , 2019, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  Jianmeng Chen,et al.  Dosage Considerations for Canakinumab in Children With Periodic Fever Syndromes , 2019, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[6]  Justin C. Earp,et al.  Esomeprazole FDA Approval in Children With GERD: Exposure-Matching and Exposure-Response , 2017, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[7]  S. Marshall,et al.  Good Practices in Model‐Informed Drug Discovery and Development: Practice, Application, and Documentation , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[8]  J. Momper,et al.  Failed Pediatric Drug Development Trials , 2015, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[9]  J. Momper,et al.  Adolescent dosing and labeling since the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[10]  I Zineh,et al.  Clinical Pharmacology and the Catalysis of Regulatory Science: Opportunities for the Advancement of Drug Development and Evaluation , 2013, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  J. Gobburu,et al.  Clarification on Precision Criteria to Derive Sample Size When Designing Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Studies , 2012, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[12]  Aaron Sachs,et al.  Pediatric information in drug product labeling. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  W. Snowden,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drug Varies With Formulation in the Target Population of Children With HIV‐1 , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[14]  Yaning Wang,et al.  Impact of Pharmacometric Analyses on New Drug Approval and Labelling Decisions , 2011, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[15]  C. Stewart,et al.  Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Avigan,et al.  Finding, evaluating, and managing drug‐related risks: approaches taken by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , 2009, Dermatologic therapy.

[17]  N. Holford,et al.  Mechanistic basis of using body size and maturation to predict clearance in humans. , 2009, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[18]  Yaning Wang,et al.  Leveraging Prior Quantitative Knowledge to Guide Drug Development Decisions and Regulatory Science Recommendations: Impact of FDA Pharmacometrics During 2004–2006 , 2008, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[19]  W Ewy,et al.  Model‐based Drug Development , 2007, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development , 1997, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.