Discrimination of Spectrally Blended Natural Images: Optimisation of the Human Visual System for Encoding Natural Images

We have developed a protocol for testing experimentally the hypothesis that the human visual system is optimised for making visual discriminations amongst natural scenes. Visual stimuli were made by gradual blending of the Fourier spectra of digitised photographs of natural scenes. The statistics of the stimuli were made unnatural to varying degrees by changing the overall slopes of the amplitude spectra of the stimuli. Thresholds were measured for discriminating small amounts of spectral blending at different spectral slopes. We found that thresholds were lowest when the spectral slope was natural; thresholds were increased when the slopes were either shallower or steeper than natural. A number of spurious cues were considered, such as differences in mean luminance or overall spectral power or contrast between test and reference stimuli. Control experiments were performed to remove such spurious cues, and the discrimination thresholds were still lowest for stimuli that were most natural. Thus, these experiments do provide experimental support for the idea that human vision and the human visual system are optimised for processing natural visual information.

[1]  Responses of neurons in the visual cortex of an echolocating bat , 1977 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  S. Laughlin.  A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[4]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Matching Coding to Scenes to Enhance Efficiency , 1983 .

[6]  C W Tyler,et al.  Phase discrimination of compound gratings: generalized autocorrelation analysis. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[8]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  J. Mollon.  "Tho' she kneel'd in that place where they grew..." The uses and origins of primate colour vision. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  D. Burr,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Field,et al.  Human discrimination of fractal images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  R. Baddeley,et al.  A statistical analysis of natural images matches psychophysically derived orientation tuning curves , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images. , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  Leslie S. Smith,et al.  The principal components of natural images , 1992 .

[15]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[16]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images , 1992 .

[17]  J. Yellott.  IMPLICATIONS OF TRIPLE CORRELATION UNIQUENESS FOR TEXTURE STATISTICS AND THE JULESZ CONJECTURE , 1993 .

[18]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Both the phase and the amplitude spectrum may determine the appearance of natural images , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of changes in the second-order statistics of natural and synthetic images , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  Philip J. Benson,et al.  Morph transformation of the facial image , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  C. C. Law,et al.  Formation of receptive fields in realistic visual environments according to the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM) theory. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Simon B. Laughlin,et al.  Visual ecology and voltage-gated ion channels in insect photoreceptors , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.

[25]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Colour vision as an adaptation to frugivory in primates , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  David H. Foster,et al.  Role of second- and third-order statistics in the discriminability of natural images , 1997 .

[27]  L. Abbott,et al.  Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Band-limited contrast in natural images explains the detectability of changes in the amplitude spectra , 1997, Vision Research.

[30]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.

[31]  S. B. Laughlin,et al.  Modelling the variation in the contrast of natural scenes, and the function of contrast normalization in the mammalian visual cortex , 1997 .

[32]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of Changes in the Slopes of the Amplitude Spectra of Natural Images: Band-Limited Contrast and Psychometric Functions , 1997, Perception.

[33]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[34]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. Mollon,et al.  Frugivory and colour vision in Alouatta seniculus, a trichromatic platyrrhine monkey , 1998, Vision Research.

[36]  T Troscianko,et al.  Color and luminance information in natural scenes. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  T Troscianko,et al.  Natural image statistics and visual processing. Are they matched , 1998 .

[38]  D. Foster,et al.  Multiple orientation-selective mechanisms for line-target detection , 1998 .

[39]  D. Ruderman,et al.  Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Mitchell G. A. Thomson,et al.  Higher-order structure in natural scenes , 1999 .

[41]  M. Thomson,et al.  Visual coding and the phase structure of natural scenes. , 1999, Network.

[42]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Unsupervised Learning , 2018, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[43]  Js McDonald.  Second order statistics affects perceived contrast in texture interactions , 2000 .

[44]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[45]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images , 2000, Current Biology.

[46]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes , 2000, Vision Research.

[47]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.