Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM

Background An acceptable, standardised outcome measure to assess efficacy and effectiveness is needed across multiple disciplines offering psychological therapies. Aims To present psychometric data on reliability, validity and sensitivity to change for the CORE–OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure). Method A 34-item self-report instrument was developed, with domains of subjective well-being, symptoms, function and risk. Analysis includes internal reliability, test–retest reliability, socio-demographic differences, exploratory principal-component analysis, correlations with other instruments, differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and assessment of change within a clinical group. Results Internal and test–retest reliability were good (0.75–0.95), as was convergent validity with seven other instruments, with large differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and good sensitivity to change. Conclusions The CORE–OM is a reliable and valid instrument with good sensitivity to change. It is acceptable in a wide range of practice settings.

[1]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[2]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  D. Goldberg,et al.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire , 1979, Psychological Medicine.

[5]  K. Lempert,et al.  CONDENSED 1,3,5-TRIAZEPINES - IV THE SYNTHESIS OF 2,3-DIHYDRO-1H-IMIDAZO-[1,2-a] [1,3,5] BENZOTRIAZEPINES , 1983 .

[6]  L. Derogatis,et al.  The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report , 1983, Psychological Medicine.

[7]  M. Gardner,et al.  Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. , 1986, British medical journal.

[8]  David J. Woodruff,et al.  Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha , 1987 .

[9]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Z. Martinovich,et al.  A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. Second Edition. , 1996 .

[13]  M. Barkham,et al.  The IIP-32: a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. , 1996, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[14]  M. Lambert,et al.  A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement , 1996 .

[15]  H. Strupp,et al.  Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders : toward a core battery , 1997 .

[16]  M. Barkham,et al.  The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health , 1998 .

[17]  M. Barkham,et al.  The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research , 1998 .

[18]  Graham Thornicroft,et al.  National Service Framework for Mental Health , 2000 .

[19]  M. Barkham,et al.  Measurement and psychotherapy , 2000, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[20]  Michael Barkham,et al.  CORE: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation , 2000 .

[21]  G. Thornicroft,et al.  Are routine outcome measures feasible in mental health? , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[22]  M. Barkham,et al.  Service profiling and Outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies : Patient-Focused Research , 2001 .

[23]  M. Barkham,et al.  Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures. , 2001, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.