Judging romantic interest of others from thin slices is a cross-cultural ability

The ability to judge the romantic interest between others is an important aspect of mate choice for species living in social groups. Research has previously shown that humans can do this quickly—observers watching short clips of speed-dating videos can accurately predict the outcomes. Here we extend this work to show that observers from widely varying cultures can judge these same videos with roughly equal accuracy. Participants in the USA, China, and Germany perform similarly not only overall but also at the level of judging individual speed-daters: Some daters are easy to read by observers from all cultures, while others are consistently difficult. These cross-cultural performance similarities provide evidence for an adaptive mechanism useful for mate choice that could be resilient to cultural differences.

[1]  Lars Penke,et al.  Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness , 2011 .

[2]  B. Ingoldsby,et al.  Mate Selection Across Cultures , 2003 .

[3]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[4]  N. Ambady,et al.  Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. , 1993 .

[5]  Gwen J. Broude Male-Female Relationships in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Study of Sex and Intimacy , 1983 .

[6]  Anmol Madan,et al.  Voices of Attraction , 2004 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Cross-cultural consensus in personality judgments. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  K. Grammer,et al.  Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  小舟 Speed Dating/闪电约会 , 2004 .

[10]  P. Ekman,et al.  DIFFERENCES Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion , 2004 .

[11]  Alex Pentland,et al.  On the Collective Nature of Human Intelligence , 2007, Adapt. Behav..

[12]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions , 2004 .

[13]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Modeling Mate Choice in Monogamous Mating Systems with Courtship , 2002, Adapt. Behav..

[14]  Lars Penke,et al.  The Ability to Judge the Romantic Interest of Others , 2009, Psychological science.

[15]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  C. B. Colby The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[18]  Skyler Place,et al.  Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. , 2010 .

[19]  Skyler Place Non-Independent Mate Choice in Humans: Deciphering and Utilizing Information in a Social Environment , 2010 .

[20]  J. Asendorpf,et al.  From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long–Term Outcomes of Speed–Dating in a Community Sample , 2011 .