ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures

Key amino acid positions that are important for maintaining the 3D structure of a protein and/or its function(s), e.g. catalytic activity, binding to ligand, DNA or other proteins, are often under strong evolutionary constraints. Thus, the biological importance of a residue often correlates with its level of evolutionary conservation within the protein family. ConSurf () is a web-based tool that automatically calculates evolutionary conservation scores and maps them on protein structures via a user-friendly interface. Structurally and functionally important regions in the protein typically appear as patches of evolutionarily conserved residues that are spatially close to each other. We present here version 3.0 of ConSurf. This new version includes an empirical Bayesian method for scoring conservation, which is more accurate than the maximum-likelihood method that was used in the earlier release. Various additional steps in the calculation can now be controlled by a number of advanced options, thus further improving the accuracy of the calculation. Moreover, ConSurf version 3.0 also includes a measure of confidence for the inferred amino acid conservation scores.

[1]  M. O. Dayhoff,et al.  Atlas of protein sequence and structure , 1965 .

[2]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[4]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[5]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  R A Sayle,et al.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[7]  J. Felsenstein.  Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[8]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new , 1997 .

[11]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL , 1997, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  B. Chait,et al.  The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. , 1998, Science.

[13]  A. Bairoch,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TrEMBL in 1999 , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  P. Waddell,et al.  Plastid Genome Phylogeny and a Model of Amino Acid Substitution for Proteins Encoded by Chloroplast DNA , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[15]  T. Blundell,et al.  Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-beta and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[16]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Tal Pupko,et al.  A structural EM algorithm for phylogenetic inference , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[18]  S. Whelan,et al.  A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues , 2002, ISMB.

[20]  Eric Martz,et al.  Protein Explorer: easy yet powerful macromolecular visualization. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  Y. Inagaki,et al.  Testing for differences in rates-across-sites distributions in phylogenetic subtrees. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  Tal Pupko,et al.  Structural Genomics , 2005 .

[23]  T. Pupko,et al.  Site-Specific Evolutionary Rate Inference: Taking Phylogenetic Uncertainty into Account , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[24]  Janusz M. Bujnicki,et al.  COLORADO3D, a web server for the visual analysis of protein structures , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: empirical Bayesian methods are superior. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[26]  C. Deprez,et al.  Solution structure of the E.coli TolA C-terminal domain reveals conformational changes upon binding to the phage g3p N-terminal domain. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.