Cardiac remodelling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES Current endografts for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are much stiffer than the aorta and have been shown to induce acute stiffening. In this study, we aimed to estimate the impact of TEVAR on left ventricular (LV) stroke work (SW) and mass using a non-invasive image-based workflow. METHODS The University of Michigan database was searched for patients treated with TEVAR for descending aortic pathologies (2013-2016). Patients with available pre-TEVAR and post-TEVAR computed tomography angiography and echocardiography data were selected. LV SW was estimated via patient-specific fluid-structure interaction analyses. LV remodelling was quantified through morphological measurements using echocardiography and electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography angiography data. RESULTS Eight subjects were included in this study, the mean age of the patients was 68 (73, 25) years, and 6 patients were women. All patients were prescribed antihypertensive drugs following TEVAR. The fluid-structure interaction simulations computed a 26% increase in LV SW post-TEVAR [0.94 (0.89, 0.34) J to 1.18 (1.11, 0.65) J, P = 0.012]. Morphological measurements revealed an increase in the LV mass index post-TEVAR of +26% in echocardiography [72 (73, 17)  g/m2 to 91 (87, 26)  g/m2, P = 0.017] and +15% in computed tomography angiography [52 (46, 29)  g/m2 to 60 (57, 22)  g/m2, P = 0.043]. The post- to pre-TEVAR LV mass index ratio was positively correlated with the post- to pre-TEVAR ratios of SW and the mean blood pressure (ρ = 0.690, P = 0.058 and ρ = 0.786, P = 0.021, respectively). CONCLUSIONS TEVAR was associated with increased LV SW and mass during follow-up. Medical device manufacturers should develop more compliant devices to reduce the stiffness mismatch with the aorta. Additionally, intensive antihypertensive management is needed to control blood pressure post-TEVAR.

[1]  Christopher J. Arthurs,et al.  A computational analysis of different endograft designs for Zone 0 aortic arch repair† , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[2]  J. Bismuth,et al.  Status of branched endovascular aortic arch repair. , 2018, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[3]  Michele Conti,et al.  Changes in aortic pulse wave velocity of four thoracic aortic stent grafts in an ex vivo porcine model , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  David M. Williams,et al.  Assessment of CardiOvascular Remodelling following Endovascular aortic repair through imaging and computation: the CORE prospective observational cohort study protocol , 2016, BMJ Open.

[5]  Christopher J. Arthurs,et al.  A mathematical model of coronary blood flow control: simulation of patient-specific three-dimensional hemodynamics during exercise , 2016, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[6]  Yanto Ridwan,et al.  In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography , 2016, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Stéphane Laurent,et al.  Central Artery Stiffness in Hypertension and Aging: A Problem With Cause and Consequence. , 2016, Circulation research.

[8]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Proximal aortic distensibility is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and incident CV events: the MESA study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Powell,et al.  Incidence of descending aortic pathology and evaluation of the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a population-based study in England and Wales from 1999 to 2010. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[10]  H. Boudoulas,et al.  Increased pulse wave velocity and arterial hypertension in young patients with thoracic aortic endografts. , 2012, Annals of vascular surgery.

[11]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Impact of aortic grafts on arterial pressure: a computational fluid dynamics study. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  D. Böckler,et al.  Endografting in the aortic arch - does the proximal landing zone influence outcome? , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  Alison L. Marsden,et al.  Outflow boundary conditions for 3D simulations of non-periodic blood flow and pressure fields in deformable arteries , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[14]  C. Kleinstreuer,et al.  Computational mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G. Lazaros,et al.  Changes in Coronary Flow Reserve following Stent Implantation in the Swine Descending Thoracic Aorta , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[16]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries , 2006 .

[17]  J. Tyberg,et al.  Endografting of the descending thoracic aorta increases ascending aortic input impedance and attenuates pressure transmission in dogs. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  Richard B Devereux,et al.  Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardio , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[19]  K. Sunagawa,et al.  Inelastic vascular prosthesis for proximal aorta increases pulsatile arterial load and causes left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  James D Cameron,et al.  Large artery stiffness predicts ischemic threshold in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  J D Thomas,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of the ventricular relaxation time constant (tau) in humans by Doppler echocardiography. , 1997, Circulation.

[22]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Single-beat estimation of end-systolic pressure-volume relation in humans. A new method with the potential for noninvasive application. , 1996, Circulation.

[23]  Y. Sugishita,et al.  Coronary circulation in dogs with an experimental decrease in aortic compliance. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  D. Kass,et al.  Effect of reduced aortic compliance on cardiac efficiency and contractile function of in situ canine left ventricle. , 1992, Circulation research.

[25]  B. Lantz,et al.  Regional distribution of cardiac output: normal values in man determined by video dilution technique. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  I. Komuro,et al.  Endovascular aortic repair increases vascular stiffness and alters cardiac structure and function. , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[27]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[28]  D. Pennell,et al.  Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.