Sensitivity analysis of the non-destructive evaluation of micro-cracks using GMR sensors

Abstract Micro-cracks in a magnetized ferromagnetic material cause stray fields that can be observed using giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors. This work investigates the applicability of GMR sensors to the non-destructive evaluation of micro-cracks via the observation of stray fields. For this purpose, our measurement setup is assessed using a fast new sensitivity analysis based on adjoint states, employing the finite-element method. A model for the GMR sensor is developed and verified. We are able to resolve micro-cracks with an opening of 3 μm and a depth of 30 μm. GMR positioning inaccuracies are analyzed.

[1]  Manuchehr Soleimani.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Permeability and Conductivity in Magnetic Induction Tomography , 2009 .

[2]  H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia,et al.  Steels for bearings , 2012 .

[3]  Andreas Neubauer,et al.  Routes for GMR-Sensor Design in Non-Destructive Testing , 2012, Sensors.

[4]  J. Remacle,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[5]  S B Palmer,et al.  The magnetic leakage field of surface-breaking cracks , 1986 .

[6]  P. Dular,et al.  A perturbation approach for the modelling of eddy current nondestructive testing problems with differential probes , 2006, 2006 12th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation.

[7]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Efficient solution of nonlinear, underdetermined inverse problems with a generalized PDE model , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  F. Förster.  New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection , 1986 .

[9]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  A general environment for the treatment of discrete problems and its application to the finite element method , 1998 .

[10]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterisation , 2006 .

[11]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[12]  E. Haber,et al.  Numerical methods for the design of large-scale nonlinear discrete ill-posed inverse problems , 2010 .

[13]  Etienne,et al.  Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[14]  H Scharfetter,et al.  Fast calculation of the sensitivity matrix in magnetic induction tomography by tetrahedral edge finite elements and the reciprocity theorem. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear finite element model , 2012 .

[16]  David L. Atherton,et al.  A study of magnetic flux-leakage signals , 1998 .

[17]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Influence of Sensor Variations on the Condition of the Magnetostatic Linear Inverse Problem , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  James G. Berryman,et al.  Analysis of Approximate Inverses in Tomography I. Resolution Analysis of Common Inverses , 2000 .

[19]  R. K. Stanley,et al.  Simulation and Analysis of 3-D Magnetic Flux Leakage , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[20]  J.R. Hare,et al.  Characterization of Surface-Breaking Cracks Using One Tangential Component of Magnetic Leakage Field Measurements , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  Peter Sergeant,et al.  Analysis of a Nondestructive Evaluation Technique for Defect Characterization in Magnetic Materials Using Local Magnetic Measurements , 2010 .

[22]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .