Ontology Engineering, Scientific Method and the Research Agenda

The call for a “focus on content” in ontology research by Nicola Guarino and Mark Musen in their launching statement of the journal Applied Ontology has quite some implications and ramifications. We reflectively discuss ontology engineering as a scientific discipline, and we put this into the wider perspective of debates in other fields. We claim and argue that ontology is a new scientific method for theory formation. This positioning allows for stronger concepts and techniques for theoretical, empirical and practical validation that in our view are now needed in the field. A prerequisite for this is an emphasis on ontology as a (domain) content oriented concept, rather than as primarily a computer representation notion. We propose that taking domain theories and the associated substantive or content reference of ontologies really seriously as first-class citizens, will actually increase the contribution of ontology engineering to the development of scientific method in general. Next, ontologies should develop from the current static representations of relatively stable domain content into actionable theories-in-use, and a possible way forward is to build in capabilities for dynamic self-organization of ontologies as service-oriented knowledge utilities that can be delivered over the Web.

[1]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: a proposal and a discussion , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[2]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Research Methods and Organization Studies , 1989 .

[3]  S. Toulmin.  Return to Reason , 2001 .

[4]  Tim Menzies.  Editorial: model-based requirements engineering , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[5]  Jan L. Top,et al.  Engineering ontologies , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  E-service design using i* and e/sup 3/ value modeling , 2006, IEEE Software.

[7]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Applied Ontology: Focusing on content , 2005, Appl. Ontology.

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[9]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[10]  Ray Offen.  Domain Understanding is the Key to Successful System Development , 2002, Requirements Engineering.

[11]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[12]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Expertise in context: human and machine , 1997 .

[13]  Z. S. Baida,et al.  Software-aided Service Bundling : Intelligent Methods and Tools for Graphical Service Modeling , 2006 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[15]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[16]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[17]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[18]  T. Broadbent,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[19]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[20]  C. Argyris.  On organizational learning , 1993 .

[21]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[22]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[23]  Howard S. Becker,et al.  Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You're Doing It , 1998 .

[24]  Danna Voth.  Naomi Ehrich Leonard's School of Collaboration , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[25]  F. V. Eemeren.  A systematic theory of argumentation , 2004 .

[26]  Peter Mika,et al.  Social Networks and the Semantic Web , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'04).

[27]  Joerg Evermann,et al.  Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: fundamental concepts , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[28]  M. Jammer.  The philosophy of quantum mechanics , 1974 .

[29]  Peter Mika,et al.  Towards a new synthesis of ontology technology and knowledge management , 2004, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[30]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Knowledge acquisition as modeling , 1993 .

[31]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  What is This Science Called Requirements Engineering? , 2006, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06).

[32]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Social Networks Applied , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[33]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  What's in an Electronic Business Model? , 2000, EKAW.

[34]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Value Webs: using ontologies to bundle real-world services , 2004, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[35]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology , 1999 .

[36]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[37]  Ann Bowling,et al.  Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services , 1997 .

[38]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques , 2004, Requirements Engineering.

[39]  Kenneth M. Ford,et al.  Thinking about android epistemology , 2006 .

[40]  J. Sayers.  Against Method , 2016 .

[41]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[42]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Using explicit ontologies in KBS development , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[44]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Empirical methods for artificial intelligence , 1995, IEEE Expert.

[45]  C. Argyris.  Reasons and rationalizations : the limits to organizational knowledge , 2004 .

[46]  Kenneth M. Ford,et al.  Thinking about Android Epistemology (AAAI Press Copublications) , 2006, AAAI 2006.