The ecosystem approach in ecological impact assessment: Lessons learned from windfarm developments on peatlands in Scotland

Abstract The Ecosystem Approach introduced in 1994 through the Convention on Biological Diversity, together with related Ecosystem-based Management and Landscape Approaches, are frequently called upon to improve ecological impact assessment. Current practice typically does not have such a systems focus and we explore the potential for explicitly adopting an Ecosystem Approach in the Environmental Impact Assessment process using wind energy development on peatland, in Scotland, as a case study. Based on a review of 21 windfarm projects (>50 MW) approved by the Scottish Government we provide an overview of current practice and identify and discuss how the 12 principles of the Ecosystem Approach can help identify options for more appropriate impact assessment. These include defining functional units of analysis that reflect the spatial and temporal linkages of peatland elements through hydrological connections, rather than a focus on individual vegetation types and simple distance buffers. Our conclusions are not limited to peatland and are relevant wherever meaningful functional management units can be defined, including in marine environments. Our results also show that environmental statements for wind energy development in Scotland largely ignore ecosystem services and the people that benefit from them. As for threatened species and other biodiversity features, an Ecosystem Approach is a prerequisite to the meaningful inclusion of ecosystem services in impact assessment.

[1]  B. Bowen Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[2]  R. E. Grumbine What Is Ecosystem Management , 1994 .

[3]  J. Rieley,et al.  Wise use of mires and peatlands , 2002 .

[4]  F. Quétier,et al.  The Cultural Dimensions of Freshwater Wetland Assessments: Lessons Learned from the Application of US Rapid Assessment Methods in France , 2015, Environmental Management.

[5]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Ecosystem services in environmental assessment — Help or hindrance? , 2013 .

[6]  J. Holden,et al.  Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration , 2004 .

[7]  Nadia Sitas,et al.  Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework , 2016 .

[8]  J. Holden,et al.  Ecosystem services of peat - Phase 1 , 2010 .

[9]  Josianne Claudia Sales Rosa,et al.  Advances and challenges of incorporating ecosystem services into impact assessment. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  J. Franklin Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Coralie Calvet,et al.  Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting , 2016 .

[12]  R. Curtin,et al.  Understanding marine ecosystem based management: A literature review , 2010 .

[13]  J. Tallis,et al.  Peat Stratigraphy and Climatic Change. A Palaeoecological Test of the Theory of Cyclic Peat Bog Regeneration. , 1981 .

[14]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Tropical Forests in the Anthropocene , 2014 .

[15]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Re-powering Scotland: Wind Farms and the ‘Energy or Environment?’ Debate , 2009 .

[16]  R. Corstanje,et al.  Operationalizing the ecosystems approach: Assessing the environmental impact of major infrastructure development , 2017 .

[17]  L. Barnthouse,et al.  Using an Ecosystem Approach to complement protection schemes based on organism-level endpoints. , 2014, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[18]  R. Lackey Seven pillars of ecosystem management , 1998 .

[19]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Road Developments in the UK: An Analysis of Ecological Assessment in Environmental Impact Statements Produced between 1993 and 1997 , 2000 .

[20]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: Evidence and challenges , 2014 .

[21]  S. Lavorel,et al.  The diversity of the ecosystem services concept and its implications for their assessment and management. , 2011, Comptes rendus biologies.

[22]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  Planning for Biodiversity: the Role of Ecological Impact Assessment , 2005 .

[23]  C. Romão,et al.  Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. , 1996 .

[24]  B. Emmett,et al.  Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007 , 2008 .

[25]  M. Siobhan Fennessy,et al.  An evaluation of rapid methods for assessing the ecological condition of wetlands , 2007, Wetlands.

[26]  R. Lindsay Peatbogs and carbon: a critical synthesis to inform policy developmentin oceanic peat bog conservation and restoration in the context of climate change. , 2010 .

[27]  R. Julliard,et al.  Bat activity in intensively farmed landscapes with wind turbines and offset measures , 2015 .

[28]  T. Minayeva,et al.  Towards ecosystem-based restoration of peatland biodiversity , 2017 .

[29]  C. Smee,et al.  United Kingdom , 2000, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[30]  K. Blackstock,et al.  The Need to Disentangle Key Concepts from Ecosystem-Approach Jargon , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  H. Rainey,et al.  A review of corporate goals of No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact on biodiversity , 2014, Oryx.

[32]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches , 2017 .

[33]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Water Movement of Mirelands. , 1981 .

[34]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  J. R. Treweek,et al.  The Ecological Component of Environmental Impact Assessment: A Critical Review of British Environmental Statements , 1997 .

[36]  Christina C. Hicks,et al.  A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations , 2013 .

[37]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda , 2013 .

[38]  J. Rodwell National Vegetation Classification: Users’ handbook , 2006 .

[39]  F. Quétier,et al.  Paying for conservation: A bioeconomic analysis of the effects of land management options on the viability of an endangered species, Eryngium alpinum , 2018 .

[40]  J. Treweek,et al.  Guidelines for ecological impact assessment in the United Kingdom , 2007 .

[41]  Jamie Freeman,et al.  Lewis Wind Power (LWP) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 2004 and 2006 - a Critical Review , 2008 .

[42]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[43]  D. Slocombe Lessons from experience with ecosystem-based management , 1998 .

[44]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Cumulative effects assessment: A review of UK environmental impact statements , 2002 .

[45]  D. Simberloff Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[46]  Ronald D. Brunner,et al.  A Practice‐based Approach to Ecosystem Management , 1997 .

[47]  M. Reed,et al.  Managing Peatland Ecosystem Services: Current UK Policy and Future Challenges in a Changing World , 2011 .

[48]  R. Lindsay Peatlands and Windfarms: Conflicting Carbon Targets and Environmental Impacts , 2016 .

[49]  N. Strange,et al.  Data transparency regarding the implementation of European ‘no net loss’ biodiversity policies , 2018 .