A Case-Based Study of Students' Visuohaptic Experiences of Electric Fields around Molecules: Shaping the Development of Virtual Nanoscience Learning Environments

Recent educational research has suggested that immersive multisensory virtual environments offer learners unique and exciting knowledge-building opportunities for the construction of scientific knowledge. This paper delivers a case-based study of students’ immersive interaction with electric fields around molecules in a multisensory visuohaptic virtual environment. The virtual architecture presented here also has conceptual connections to the flourishing quest in contemporary literature for the pressing need to communicate nanoscientific ideas to learners. Five upper secondary school students’ prior conceptual understanding of electric fields and their application of this knowledge to molecular contexts, were probed prior to exposure to the virtual model. Subsequently, four students interacted with the visuohaptic model while performing think-aloud tasks. An inductive and heuristic treatment of videotaped verbal and behavioural data revealed distinct interrelationships between students’ interactive strategies implemented when executing tasks in the virtual system and the nature of their conceptual knowledge deployed. The obtained qualitative case study evidence could serve as an empirical basis for informing the rendering and communication of overarching nanoscale ideas. At the time of composing this paper for publication in the current journal, the research findings of this study have been put into motion in informing a broader project goal of developing educational virtual environments for depicting nanophenomena.

[1]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[2]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[3]  Chris Dede,et al.  The design of immersive virtual learning environments: Fostering deep understandings of complex scientific knowledge. , 2000 .

[4]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[5]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[6]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Aleš Křenek Haptic Rendering of Molecular Conformations , 2001 .

[8]  A. Stoneham The challenges of nanostructures for theory , 2003 .

[9]  Rosária Justi,et al.  A Case Study of the Development of a Beginning Chemistry Teacher's Knowledge about Models and Modelling , 2005 .

[10]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  A Model of Factors Determining Students’ Ability to Interpret External Representations in Biochemistry , 2009 .

[11]  Scott Smidt Review of The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering: A Guidebook for Secondary Teachers , 2012 .

[12]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  A Rubric for post-secondary degree programs in nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2009 .

[15]  Chi-Yan Tsui,et al.  Understanding Genetics: Analysis of Secondary Students' Conceptual Status. , 2007 .

[16]  Konrad J. Schönborn,et al.  Exploring relationships between students' interaction and learning with a haptic virtual biomolecular model , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[17]  V. Albe,et al.  Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: a review of literature , 2010 .

[18]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[19]  Jenaro Guisasola,et al.  Difficulties in learning the concept of electric field , 1998 .

[20]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature , 1999 .

[21]  Paul Richard,et al.  Multi-modal virtual environments for education with haptic and olfactory feedback , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[22]  M. Cecilia Pocoví,et al.  The effects of a history-based instructional material on the students' understanding of field lines , 2007 .

[23]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[24]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science & Engineering: A Guidebook for Secondary Teachers , 2009 .

[26]  Vaille Dawson,et al.  An Exploration of High School (12–17 Year Old) Students' Understandings of, and Attitudes Towards Biotechnology Processes , 2007 .

[27]  E. Glasersfeld Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching , 1989, Synthese.

[28]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Conceptual Boundaries and Distances: Students' and Experts' Concepts of the Scale of Scientific Phenomena , 2006 .

[29]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Helping students revise disruptive experientially supported ideas about thermodynamics: Computer visualizations and tactile models , 2004 .

[30]  M. Gail Jones,et al.  The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[31]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Conceptual Construction of Fields Through Tactile Interface , 1999, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[32]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry , 2000 .

[33]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Haptic feedback and students' learning about levers: Unraveling the effect of simulated touch , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Carl A. Batt,et al.  Numbers, scale and symbols: the public understanding of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[35]  Anders Ynnerman,et al.  Haptic Rendering of Dynamic Volumetric Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  Kerstin Pettersson,et al.  Confusion by representation: On student’s comprehension of the electric field concept , 1993 .

[37]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Haptics in Education: Exploring an Untapped Sensory Modality , 2006 .