Quality measurement and quality assurance in higher education

This paper discusses the notion of quality measurement and describes the role of an enterprise‐wide, technology‐based continuous Quality Measurement System (QMS2000) in the quality assurance program at the University of Louisville. QMS2000 is a relational, interactive information system that includes data from 273 student, alumni, faculty, staff, and employer satisfaction surveys that are linked to corresponding databases at the university. QMS2000 is on‐line, operating in a networked, client‐server environment that permits licensed users access to designated components of the system at any time from designated desktops at the university. QMS2000 users generate reports and perform advanced statistical analyses drawing from the databases. The data and reports are integrated into the accreditation, strategic planning, budgeting, outcomes assessment, and program review processes at the university. The paper closes with a discussion of the initial impacts of QMS2000 on the university’s efforts at quality assurance.

[1]  E. Chaffee,et al.  Quality: Transforming Postsecondary Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 3, 1992. , 1992 .

[2]  Mimi Wolverton,et al.  A New Alliance: Continuous Quality and Classroom Effectiveness. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6. , 1994 .

[3]  A. Astin,et al.  Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education. , 1991 .

[4]  C. J. Lucas,et al.  Crisis in the Academy: Rethinking Higher Education in America , 1996 .

[5]  Douglas H. Smith,et al.  Total Quality in Higher Education , 1994 .

[6]  P. Ewell.  A Matter of Integrity Accountability and the Future of Self-Regulation , 1994 .

[7]  Jeffrey W. Alstete.  Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices To Improve Quality. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5. , 1995 .

[8]  T. Banta.  Moving Assessment Forward: Enabling Conditions and Stumbling Blocks. , 1997 .

[9]  Michael G. Dolence,et al.  Strategic Change in Colleges and Universities: Planning to Survive and Prosper , 1997 .

[10]  Daniel Seymour,et al.  TQM: Focus on Performance, Not Resources. , 1993 .

[11]  Robert Cornesky,et al.  Implementing Total Quality Management in Higher Education. , 1991 .

[12]  Mimi Wolverton,et al.  A New Alliance: Continuous Quality and Classroom Effectiveness. ERIC Digest. , 1994 .

[13]  William G. Tierney.  Building the Responsive Campus: Creating High Performance Colleges and Universities , 1999 .

[14]  P. Ewell.  Assessment and the "New Accountability": A Challenge for Higher Education's Leadership. ECS Working Papers. , 1990 .

[15]  Jann E. Freed,et al.  A Culture for Academic Excellence: Implementing the Quality Principles in Higher Education , 1996 .

[16]  D. Seymour.  On Q: Causing Quality In Higher Education , 1992 .

[17]  Jann E. Freed,et al.  Quality Principles and Practices in Higher Education: Different Questions for Different Times , 1997 .

[18]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[19]  E. Chaffee,et al.  Quality: Transforming Postsecondary Education , 1992 .

[20]  Trudy W. Banta,et al.  Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1999 .

[21]  D. Seymour.  TQM on Campus: What the Pioneers Are Finding. , 1991 .

[22]  L. Sherr,et al.  Total Quality Management in Higher Education. , 1991 .