Dynamic Bandwidth Part Allocation in 5G Ultra Reliable Low Latency Communication for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with High Data Rate Traffic

The 3GPP standardized the physical layer specification in 5G New Radio to support enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) and ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) coexistence in usage scenarios including aerial vehicles (AVs). Dynamic multiplexing of URLLC traffic was standardized to increase the outage capacity. DM allocates a fully overlapped bandwidth part (BWP) of eMBB and URLLC AVs to perform the immediate scheduling of URLLC traffic by puncturing ongoing eMBB traffic. However, DM often suffers from a significant frame error incurred by puncturing. Meanwhile, BWP can be sliced orthogonally for eMBB and URLLC AVs, possibly preventing overdimensioning the resources depending on the eMBB and URLLC traffic loads. In this paper, we propose a dynamic BWP allocation scheme that switches between two multiplexing methods, dynamic multiplexing (DM) and orthogonal slicing (OS), so as to minimize an impact of uRLLC traffic on eMBB traffic. To implement efficient BWP allocation, the capacity region is analyzed by considering the effect of physical layer parameters, such as modulation and coding scheme (MCS) levels and code block group size on DM and OS. OS is effective for improving the eMBB throughput under a URLLC latency constraint for deterministic and predictable URLLC traffic, whereas DM has limited error-correcting capability against the URLLC’s puncturing effect. The relative MCS level of eMBB and URLLC is critical in determining the eMBB traffic tolerance against puncturing. Identifying the performance tradeoff between DM and OS, the tolerance level is quantified by a URLLC load threshold. It is given in an approximate closed form, which is an essential reference for selecting DM over OS, enabling dynamic BWP allocation for the URLLC AV.

[1]  Karol Schober,et al.  Impact of Bandwidth Part (BWP) Switching on 5G NR System Performance , 2019, 2019 IEEE 2nd 5G World Forum (5GWF).

[2]  Jeongho Jeon,et al.  NR Wide Bandwidth Operations , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Chung Gu Kang,et al.  System-level Performance Evaluation with 5G K-SimSys for 5G URLLC System , 2019, 2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC).

[4]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  Preemption-Aware Rank Offloading Scheduling for Latency Critical Communications in 5G Networks , 2019, 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring).

[5]  Wanshi Chen,et al.  5G ultra-reliable and low-latency systems design , 2017, 2017 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC).

[6]  Walid Saad,et al.  A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Baoming Bai,et al.  Nonbinary LDPC codes constructed based on a cyclic MDS code and a low-complexity nonbinary message-passing decoding algorithm , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Wei Yang,et al.  Dynamic URLLC and eMBB Multiplexing Design in 5G New Radio , 2020, 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC).

[9]  M. Kerimov The theory of error-correcting codes☆ , 1980 .

[10]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Joint Scheduling of URLLC and eMBB Traffic in 5G Wireless Networks , 2017, IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[11]  O. Antoine,et al.  Theory of Error-correcting Codes , 2022 .

[12]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Joint Link Adaptation and Scheduling for 5G Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications , 2018, IEEE Access.

[13]  Klaus I. Pedersen,et al.  Punctured Scheduling for Critical Low Latency Data on a Shared Channel with Mobile Broadband , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).