Monotonic and cyclic response of speed-lock connections with bolts in storage racks

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to explore the bearing capacity and energy dissipation of several variations of speed-lock connections of cold-formed steel storage racks. Commonly used speed-lock connection exists large slippage and low energy dissipation capacity, new speed-lock connections with additional bolts (and welds) are investigated in order to enhance its performance. Their monotonic behavior and hysteretic response under cyclic loading were studied experimentally using a cantilever test method. The tests were conducted using both the EN 15512 monotonic protocol and AISC seismic provisions’ cyclic-test protocol for each specimen. The failure modes, moment–rotation response, and associated stiffnesses, bearing capacities, and energy dissipation capabilities were fully investigated. Both monotonic and cyclic responses showed that the additional bolts (and welds) significantly enhanced the bearing capacities and deformability of the connections, though the initial stiffness and equivalent stiffness (i.e., according to the EN 15512 specification) showed little improvement. The hysteretic responses of all connection variations investigated demonstrated pinching behaviors. The energy dissipation capability has been greatly improved with additional bolts (and welds) except of the one with only lower bolts, which could also be corroborated through the analyses of the calculated equivalent viscous damping coefficient and the displacement ductility factor. In addition, the stiffness degradation has been observed for both positive loading and negative loading, and adding bolts and welds could effectively reduce this effect.

[1]  Nadia Baldassino,et al.  Analysis and behaviour of steel storage pallet racks , 2000 .

[2]  B Cheng Experiment on Bolted Beam-to-column Connections in Assembled Steel Storage Racks , 2013 .

[3]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  Experimental monotonic and cyclic behaviour of blind-bolted angle connections , 2009 .

[4]  R. G. Beale,et al.  Methods of restraining progressive collapse in rack structures , 2009 .

[5]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Evaluation of connection flexibility in cold formed steel racks , 2010 .

[6]  Dan Dubina,et al.  Cold-formed steel trusses with semi-rigid joints , 1997 .

[7]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Bolted moment connections in drive-in and drive-through steel storage racks , 2010 .

[8]  Jian Yang,et al.  Numerical simulation of sleeve connections for cold formed steel sigma sections , 2015 .

[9]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Experimental analysis on the cyclic behaviour of beam-to-column joints in steel storage pallet racks , 2001 .

[10]  Yiyi Chen,et al.  Flexural behavior of steel storage rack beam-to-upright connections , 2014 .

[11]  Kwok-Fai Chung,et al.  Experimental investigation on bolted moment connections among cold formed steel members , 1999 .

[12]  R. G. Beale,et al.  Experimental analysis of semi-rigid boltless connectors , 1997 .

[13]  Kamal M. Bajoria,et al.  Determination of flexibility of beam-to-column connectors used in thin walled cold-formed steel pallet racking systems , 2006 .

[14]  Gregory J. Hancock,et al.  Steel Storage Racking , 2001 .

[15]  Carlos Aguirre Aguirre,et al.  Seismic behavior of rack structures , 2005 .