Assessing Forest Governance in the Countries of the Greater Mekong Subregion

The forest landscapes of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) are changing dramatically, with a multitude of impacts from local to global levels. These changes invariably have their foundations in forest governance. The aim of this paper is to assess perceptions of key stakeholders regarding the state of forest governance in the countries of the GMS. The work is based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the perceptions of forest governance in the five GMS countries, involving 762 representatives from government, civil society, news media, and rural communities. The work identified many challenges to good forest governance in the countries in the region, as well as noting reasons for optimism. Generally speaking, there was a feeling that the policies, legislation, and institutional frameworks were supportive, but there are numerous challenges in terms of implementation, enforcement, and compliance. The work also presents a program of activities recommended by the research participants to address governance challenges and opportunities in the GMS countries. These include the development of a forest governance monitoring system, and initiatives that support informed decision-making by forest product consumers in the region as well as the implementation of a capacity development program for non-state actors (e.g., civil society, news media) to ensure they are more able to support the diverse, and often demanding, forest governance initiatives.

[1]  L. Hein,et al.  Governance, Decentralisation and Deforestation: The Case of Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia , 2015 .

[2]  D. Gilmour.  Forty years of community-based forestry: a review of its extent and effectiveness , 2016 .

[3]  Nabsiah Abdul Wahid,et al.  Investigation of green marketing tools' effect on consumers' purchase behavior , 2011 .

[4]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? , 2014 .

[5]  Nancy Hart,et al.  Framework for assessing and monitoring forest governance , 2011 .

[6]  B. Arts,et al.  Forest devolution in Vietnam: From rhetoric to performance , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[7]  ศุภเจตน์ จันทร์สาส์น,et al.  ธรรมาภิบาลของภาครัฐ: นัยจาก Worldwide Governance Indicators , 2012 .

[8]  P. To.  State Territorialization and Illegal Logging: The Dynamic Relationships between Practices and Images of the State in Vietnam , 2015 .

[9]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Can legality verification rescue global forest governance , 2012 .

[10]  Aksel Sundström.  Understanding illegality and corruption in forest governance. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Horm Chandet.  Land grabbing and forest conflict in Cambodia : Implications for community and sustainable forest management , 2014 .

[12]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Changing Governance of the World's Forests , 2008, Science.

[13]  T. Nielsen.  From REDD+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC , 2016 .

[14]  I. Baird.  Making spaces: The ethnic Brao people and the international border between Laos and Cambodia , 2010 .

[15]  P. Hirsch,et al.  The Political Economy of Land Governance in the Mekong Region , 2015 .

[16]  M. Brockhaus,et al.  Equity and REDD+ in the Media: a Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses , 2013 .

[17]  L. Giessen,et al.  Defining and assessing forest governance , 2014 .

[18]  Y. Yasmi,et al.  Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) , 2018 .

[19]  Matthew J. Smith,et al.  The Environmental Legacy of Modern Tropical Deforestation , 2016, Current Biology.

[20]  D. Gritten,et al.  The use and effectiveness of mediation in forest and land conflict transformation in Southeast Asia: Case studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand , 2015 .

[21]  I. Grundy.  Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform , 2010 .

[22]  A. Tatem,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations , 2009 .

[23]  Nalin Kishor,et al.  Assessing and monitoring forest governance : a user's guide to a diagnostic tool , 2012 .

[24]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Sarinda Singh.  Borderland practices and narratives: Illegal cross-border logging in northeastern Cambodia , 2014 .

[26]  K. Macdicken,et al.  Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: how are the world's forests changing? , 2015 .

[27]  D. Gritten,et al.  An Uneven Playing Field: Regulatory Barriers to Communities Making a Living from the Timber from Their Forests-Examples from Cambodia, Nepal and Vietnam , 2015 .

[28]  Kayoko Kondo,et al.  The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities , 2013 .

[29]  S. Milne.  Cambodia's Unofficial Regime of Extraction: Illicit Logging in the Shadow of Transnational Governance and Investment , 2015 .

[30]  P. Satyal.  Assessing Civil Society Participation in REDD+ and FLEGT:Case Study Analysis of Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo , 2017 .

[31]  S. Rahman,et al.  International and Domestic Sustainable Forest Management Policies: Distributive Effects on Power among State Agencies in Bangladesh , 2016 .

[32]  S. Lawson.  Illegal Wood Import and Re-export: The Scale of the Problem and the Response in Thailand, South Korea and India , 2014 .

[33]  M. Curley.  Governing Civil Society in Cambodia: Implications of the NGO Law for the “Rule of Law” , 2018 .

[34]  A. McGregor.  Routledge handbook of the environment in Southeast Asia , 2019 .

[35]  P. Satyal.  Civil society participation in REDD+ and FLEGT processes: Case study analysis from Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo , 2018, Forest Policy and Economics.

[36]  W. Dressler,et al.  Social Networks of Corruption in the Vietnamese and Lao Cross-Border Timber Trade , 2014 .

[37]  Y. Tegegne,et al.  Resources and Rules of the Game: Participation of Civil Society in REDD+ and FLEGT‐VPA Processes in Lao PDR , 2017 .

[38]  Robin Biddulph,et al.  Whose Reality Counts? Critical Junctures in Livelihood Trajectories Under Deforestation , 2017 .

[39]  W. Dressler,et al.  Moral economies and markets: ‘Insider’ cassava trading in Kon Tum, Vietnam , 2016 .

[40]  B. Cashore,et al.  Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance , 2011 .

[41]  D. Gritten,et al.  Transforming forest landscape conflicts: the promises and perils of global forest management initiatives such as REDD+. , 2018 .

[42]  Lorraine Elliott.  ASEAN and Environmental Governance: Strategies of Regionalism in Southeast Asia , 2012, Global Environmental Politics.

[43]  N. Peluso,et al.  Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand , 2001, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[44]  I. Visseren-Hamakers,et al.  A reality check on the landscape approach to REDD+: Lessons from Latin America , 2017 .

[45]  J. Saunders.  Trade in Illegal Timber: The Response in Vietnam , 2014 .

[46]  Nathan M. Jensen,et al.  Globalization and the Politics of Natural Resources , 2011 .

[47]  T. Maraseni,et al.  An assessment of governance quality for community-based forest management systems in Asia: Prioritisation of governance indicators at various scales , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[48]  Deborah Lawrence,et al.  Effects of tropical deforestation on climate and agriculture , 2015 .

[49]  Alison L. Hoare,et al.  Tackling Illegal Logging and the Related Trade: What Progress and Where Next? , 2015 .