Experimental validation of a magnetorheological energy absorber design analysis

A key challenge when designing linear stroke magnetorheological energy absorbers for high-speed impact is that high piston speeds in linear stroke magnetorheological energy absorbers induce high Reynolds number flows in the magnetic valve of the magnetorheological energy absorber, so that achieving high controllable dynamic range can be a design challenge. So far, the research on magnetorheological energy absorbers has typically assumed that the off-state force increases linearly with piston velocity. But at the higher piston velocities occurring in impact events, the off-state damping exhibits nonlinear velocity squared damping effects. This problem was recognized in our prior work, where it was shown that minor losses are important contributing factors to off-state damping. In this study, a nonlinear analytical magnetorheological energy absorber model is developed based on a Bingham-plastic nonlinear flow model combined with velocity squared dependent minor loss factors. This refined model is denoted as the Bingham-plastic nonlinear flow model with minor losses. From this Bingham-plastic nonlinear flow model with minor losses, an effective design strategy is presented for conventional magnetorheological energy absorbers. The Bingham-plastic nonlinear flow model with minor losses is validated via computational fluid dynamics simulation, so that magnetorheological energy absorber performance can be analytically verified before being manufactured. The magnetorheological energy absorber is fabricated and tested up to an effective piston velocity of 5 m/s by using the high-speed drop tower facility at the GM R&D Center. Comparison of our analysis with measured data is conducted, and the effective design of the magnetorheological energy absorber using the Bingham-plastic nonlinear flow model with minor losses is validated.

[1]  Faramarz Gordaninejad,et al.  A New Magneto-rheological Fluid Damper for High-mobility Multi-purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) , 2008 .

[2]  Joseph B. Franzini,et al.  Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. 6th Ed. By R. L.DAUGHERTY and J. B. FRANZINI. McGraw-Hill. 1965. 574 pp. $9.95 or 80s. Fluid Dynamics. By J. W. DAILY and D. R. F. HARLEMAN. Addison Wesley. 1966. 454 pp. $12.50 or 94s. , 1967, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Magnetorheological fluid dampers: a review of parametric modelling , 2011 .

[4]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Semi-Active Control of Vertical Stroking Helicopter Crew Seat for Enhanced Crashworthiness , 2007 .

[5]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Shock Isolation Systems Using Magnetorheological Dampers , 2008 .

[6]  Wei Hu,et al.  Performance Analysis of Magnetorheological Energy Absorbers Under Impact Conditions , 2008 .

[7]  N. Johnson,et al.  Dynamic crush tests using a “free-flight” drop tower: theory , 2002 .

[8]  Wei Hu,et al.  Shock load mitigation using magnetorheological energy absorber with bifold valves , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[9]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Large-Scale Magnetorheological Damper Systems for Civil Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[10]  N. Wereley,et al.  Nondimensional analysis of semi-active electrorheological and magnetorheological dampers using approximate parallel plate models , 1998 .

[11]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Non-dimensional analysis and design of a magnetorheological damper , 2005 .

[12]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  ADAPTIVE ENERGY ABSORBERS FOR DROP-INDUCED SHOCK MITIGATION , 2011 .

[13]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers. Part I: system integration and modelling , 2009 .

[14]  Alan L. Browne,et al.  Impact Performance of Magnetorheological Fluids , 2009 .

[15]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[16]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  A Magnetorheological Damper with Bifold Valves for Shock and Vibration Mitigation , 2007 .

[17]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  Rheological controllability of double-ended MR dampers subjected to impact loading , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  William A. Bullough,et al.  Dynamic modelling of an ER vibration damper for vehicle suspension applications , 1996 .

[19]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Dynamic crush tests using a “free-flight” drop tower: practical aspects , 2002 .

[20]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Effective design strategy for a magneto-rheological damper using a nonlinear flow model , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[21]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Electrorheological Dampers, Part I: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[22]  John C. Dixon,et al.  The shock absorber handbook , 2007 .

[23]  Wei-Hsin Liao,et al.  Semi-active suspension systems for railway vehicles using magnetorheological dampers. Part II: simulation and analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Nondimensional Herschel—Bulkley Analysis of Magnetorheological and Electrorheological Dampers , 2008 .